arXiv Computation and Language By Maxime Bouthors, Josep Crego, Fran\c{c}ois Yvon

Reasoning about In-Context Samples for Machine-Translation

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper proposes a fragment‑based reasoning framework for large language model–based machine translation. It extracts parallel source‑target fragments from retrieved similar examples and uses these fragments as intermediate reasoning traces to generate the final translation. Experiments with the Qwen3 model across six languages and multiple domains show that this approach outperforms standard k‑shot or basic drafting methods.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

When Does Reasoning Help in Machine Translation? A Hierarchical Analysis of LRM Reasoning Traces

The paper investigates when intermediate reasoning traces benefit machine translation by examining models, languages, domains, and datasets. It finds that the optimal reasoning language depends on the model, reasoning length has a non‑monotonic effect on quality, and traces display recurring functional patterns. Using Hierarchical Meta‑Summarization, the authors uncover a shared structure of understanding/planning, translating/drafting, and refining/verifying, while also noting domain‑specific variations, suggesting that reasoning should be tailored rather than uniformly applied.

By Yuxiang Liu, Jiaming Luo, Eleftheria Briakou, Colin Cherry
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

Reasoning over Grammar: Can Synthetic Linguistic Reasoning Traces Enhance Low-Resource Machine Translation?

The paper explores whether structured linguistic reasoning traces can improve low‑resource machine translation by guiding large language models (LLMs). It proposes a pipeline that automatically generates step‑by‑step reasoning traces from Universal Dependencies treebanks, dictionaries, and grammar‑rule banks, and evaluates these traces in in‑context learning, supervised fine‑tuning, and reinforcement fine‑tuning on Xibe and Chintang. The results show that providing reliable reasoning traces at inference time significantly boosts translation quality, whereas using them as training data yields smaller, less consistent gains, indicating that LLMs can benefit from grammatical guidance but struggle to generate accurate analyses themselves.

By Renhao Pei, Yihong Liu, Sampo Pyysalo, Hinrich Sch\"utze, Shaoxiong Ji
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 22

LongZero: Enhancing Long-Context Reasoning in LLMs from Zero Data

LongZero is a reinforcement learning method that enables large language models to improve long‑context reasoning without external data. It works by having the model first generate a compact, structured question‑answer pair with supporting evidence, then expanding that evidence into a long, multi‑document context. The approach combines self‑written multi‑hop reasoning and multi‑round retrieval tasks, trained with GRPO, and outperforms baseline RL methods on five long‑context reasoning benchmarks.

By Zhennan Wan, Jianfei Chen