arXiv:2607. 23404v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-driving laboratories increasingly rely on multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO) to balance cheap, approximate evaluations against scarce, expensive ones, with a predictive surrogate at its core.
By Jaewook Lee, Ethan Errington, Christian D. Lorenz, Miao Guo
arXiv:2606. 30961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Advances in deep learning architectures and representations have enabled ML-driven chemical property prediction, but state-of-the-art (SOTA) models have remained largely confined to independent codebases and lack support for diverse chemical species.
By Jacob W. Toney, Samir Darouich, Yiran Wang, Aaron G. Garrison, Johannes K\"astner, Heather J. Kulik
The paper introduces a benchmark to evaluate compositional generalisation in machine learning interatomic potentials. It comprises four tasks that test models on unseen molecules, designed so that learning underlying chemical principles should enable generalisation. Experiments show that current state‑of‑the‑art models struggle, with out‑of‑distribution errors often an order of magnitude higher than in‑distribution errors, even for foundation models pre‑trained on millions of molecules.
By Amir Masoud Nourollah, Irtaza Khalid, Stefano Leoni, Steven Schockaert
arXiv:2606. 30170v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative molecular design is shaped by simple proxy benchmarks for drug-like properties and models pretrained on large pharmaceutical datasets.
By Matthias Blaschke, Daniel Kienzle, Zsuzsanna Koczor-Benda, Julian Lorenz, Rainer Lienhart, Fabian Pauly
The paper proposes pre-training uncertainty estimators on large, diverse materials science datasets to improve uncertainty quantification (UQ) for machine‑learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs). By evaluating these pre‑trained models on both in‑distribution and out‑of‑domain adsorption‑energy predictions, the authors demonstrate that zero‑shot UQ is viable and that fine‑tuning yields strong correlations between predicted uncertainty and actual prediction error, even on challenging datasets. This approach aims to provide foundational UQ models that enable broader, more reliable deployment of MLIPs across chemical space.
By Stefan P. Schmid, Tobias Setzer, Maximilian Scheurer
BOOM is a new benchmark for evaluating out‑of‑distribution (OOD) molecular property predictions in machine learning. It provides chemically‑informed tests across common property prediction tasks and assesses over 150 model‑task combinations. The study shows that current models, including chemical foundation models, struggle to generalize OOD, with the best model still exhibiting three times higher error than in‑distribution predictions.
By Evan R. Antoniuk, Shehtab Zaman, Tal Ben-Nun, Peggy Li, James Diffenderfer, Busra Sahin, Obadiah Smolenski, Everett Grethel, Tim Hsu, Anna M. Hiszpanski, Kenneth Chiu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Brian Van Essen