arXiv AI By Prathamjyot Singh, Ashima Sood, Sahil Sharma, Jasmeet Singh

ProSarc: Prosody-Aware Sarcasm Recognition Framework via Temporal Prosodic Incongruity

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 06168v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present ProSarc, an audio-only framework that detects sarcasm by modelling temporal prosodic incongruity, that is, the mismatch between local prosodic dynamics and the utterance-level emotional baseline.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

When Models Hear What They Expect: Diagnosing Prosodic Heuristics in Multimodal Sarcasm Detection

The study investigates how multimodal large language models (MLLMs) use prosodic cues in sarcasm detection. By testing Qwen2.5‑Omni and Qwen3‑Omni on Mandarin Chinese and English across five modality conditions, the authors find that adding audio increases false positives without improving true positives. Acoustic error analysis shows that models rely on a stereotypical prosodic pattern—elevated pitch and irregular pausing—that does not align with genuine sarcasm cues, and manipulating these dimensions alone can raise false positive rates up to 60%. The same effect appears in Gemini 3 Flash Preview, indicating the heuristic is not limited to a single architecture.

By Yongjian Chen, Pengfei Wei, Yiqun Sun, Zhu Li, Lawrence B. Hsieh
arXiv Computation and Language
1d ago

Incongruence-Aware Evaluation of Multimodal Speech Emotion Recognition in Audio Large Language Models

The paper introduces an incongruence score that quantifies disagreement between a speaker’s verbal content and vocal expression in a shared valence‑arousal‑dominance space, validated against human judgments. Using this metric, the authors evaluate three audio‑capable large language models across acted, conversational, and spontaneous speech datasets, finding that higher incongruence consistently increases error rates when audio is present. The study also shows that supervised classifiers behave oppositely, suggesting the challenge lies in how models fuse multimodal evidence rather than in the signal itself, and that the score remains predictive even without an emotion lexicon.

By Fengji Jing, Guy Laban