The study investigates how multimodal large language models (MLLMs) use prosodic cues in sarcasm detection. By testing Qwen2.5‑Omni and Qwen3‑Omni on Mandarin Chinese and English across five modality conditions, the authors find that adding audio increases false positives without improving true positives. Acoustic error analysis shows that models rely on a stereotypical prosodic pattern—elevated pitch and irregular pausing—that does not align with genuine sarcasm cues, and manipulating these dimensions alone can raise false positive rates up to 60%. The same effect appears in Gemini 3 Flash Preview, indicating the heuristic is not limited to a single architecture.
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) process speech and text jointly, yet whether they exploit prosodic cues for pragmatic inference or rely on surface acoustic patterns has received little system...
arXiv:2609.16582v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Spoken sarcasm detectors may exploit lexical content, prosody, or their interaction, yet conventional evaluation cannot reveal which cues drive their...
arXiv:2606. 06168v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present ProSarc, an audio-only framework that detects sarcasm by modelling temporal prosodic incongruity, that is, the mismatch between local prosodic dynamics and the utterance-level emotional baseline.
arXiv:2608. 19942v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal sarcasm detection aims to identify sarcastic intent from multimodal content, where inconsistencies between literal meaning and contextual cues often signal irony.
arXiv:2608.30260v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While it is well-established that prosody carries crucial cues for syntactic structure, the degree and nature of correspondence between these two dom...
Multimodal sarcasm detection aims to identify sarcastic intent from multimodal content, where inconsistencies between literal meaning and contextual cues often signal irony. This task has attracted increasing research attention.
arXiv:2606. 15888v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Non-verbal vocalizations (NVs), such as laughter, sighs, and coughs, are important acoustic cues for emotion and intent.
This paper investigates whether prosodic features—pitch, energy, and timing—are preserved when speech is translated between languages. Using multilingual dubbing data for English‑German, English‑Spanish, and English‑French pairs, the authors conduct a fine‑grained cross‑lingual analysis to quantify similarities and differences in prosody. The study identifies inherent cross‑lingual correlations in prosodic structure and explores how linguistic and alignment factors influence these patterns.
arXiv:2507.18061v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Spoken Language Models (SLMs) are expected to support natural spoken interaction beyond task completion. However, existing SLM benchmarks pri...
Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have been widely used as judge models for the automatic evaluation of generated speech. However, prior approaches predominantly focus on holistic naturalness, leaving fine-grained paralinguistic distinctions underexplored.
arXiv:2606. 27717v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prosodic emphasis varies across languages, emotions, and speaking styles, yet existing emphasis detection models are largely trained and evaluated on monolingual neutral read speech.
arXiv:2603.23938v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Most testbeds for omni-modal models assess multimodal understanding via textual outputs, leaving it unclear whether these models can properly speak...