arXiv:2606. 05433v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier AI governance frameworks increasingly use cumulative training compute as the primary criterion for designating high-impact models, but enforcement rests on self-reporting because no technical verification primitive for training exists.
By Pierre Peign\'e, Ky Nguyen, Paul Wang
The paper introduces Open-1B, a language model trained under a new fully auditable regime that ensures every training operation is reproducible on heterogeneous commodity hardware with bitwise certainty. By enforcing a fixed order on sources of nondeterminism—GPU reductions, data batch ordering, and inter/intra-node communication—the authors enable auditors to replay and verify individual training steps on a single machine. The release includes the full pretraining dataset, all intermediate checkpoints, the training codebase, and an audit harness for step-by-step verification.
By John Donaghy, Brian Wilcox, O\u{g}uzhan Ersoy, Shikhar Rastogi, Adam St Arnaud, Alexey Titov, Jordan Greenberg, Ben Fielding, Harry Grieve
arXiv:2510. 16028v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Neural networks increasingly run on hardware outside the user's control (cloud GPUs, inference marketplaces).
By Jianzhu Yao, Hongxu Su, Taobo Liao, Zerui Cheng, Huan Zhang, Xuechao Wang, Pramod Viswanath
OVIG is an optimistic verification framework that audits AI training by replaying the process and comparing gradient differences against an empirically calibrated boundary. It treats any gradient difference exceeding this boundary as a malicious deviation. By partitioning training into stride‑s intervals and storing evidence only at interval endpoints, OVIG dramatically reduces off‑chain storage and transmission costs while maintaining zero attack success rate across language, vision, and diffusion workloads.
By Hongxu Su, Jianzhu Yao, Huan Zhang, Xuechao Wang, Pramod Viswanath
arXiv:2603. 18046v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present NanoZK, a zero-knowledge proof system for verifiable LLM inference: clients and third-party auditors check that a provider executed the advertised model on a committed input without learning weights or activations.
By Zhaohui Wang
arXiv:2610.08258v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Auditing the claimed outcomes of large language model (LLM) training is challenging when model weights and training data are private, while cryptograph...
By Junkai Liang, Zhanpeng Guo, Pengfei Wu, Qingni Shen, Jiaheng Zhang, Zhonghai Wu, Haiyang Xue, Shengfang Zhai