arXiv Machine Learning

OPEN-1B: A Fully Auditable Training Run

The paper introduces Open-1B, a language model trained under a new fully auditable regime that ensures every training operation is reproducible on heterogeneous commodity hardware with bitwise certainty. By enforcing a fixed order on sources of nondeterminism—GPU reductions, data batch ordering, and inter/intra-node communication—the authors enable auditors to replay and verify individual training steps on a single machine. The release includes the full pretraining dataset, all intermediate checkpoints, the training codebase, and an audit harness for step-by-step verification.

arXiv Machine Learning
6d ago

Numbat: Building and Verifying a Self-Contained Machine-Learning Stack

The paper introduces Numbat, a self‑contained machine‑learning stack implemented entirely in Zig with no external runtime dependencies. It covers tensor computation, automatic differentiation, neural‑network modules, mixed precision, multi‑GPU training, data loading, and monitoring, and exposes a stable C ABI with over 1,400 entry points and bindings for six languages. The authors verify the stack against a reference implementation at multiple levels, uncovering ten silent recipe divergences, and demonstrate its practical capability by training a 25.9M‑parameter YOLOv8m detector on COCO 2017, achieving a competitive mAP score and matching single‑GPU performance.

By Thang Tran (CloudKites AI Lab, New South Wales, Australia), Lan Dang (Monash Business School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia)
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Bit-Exact AI Inference Verification Without Performance Tradeoffs

arXiv:2606. 00279v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Verifying claims about AI workloads is a pre- requisite for credible AI governance of covert adversaries (who comply with monitoring only when detection likelihood is high), yet the ap- parent non-determinism of GPU floating-point arithmetic forces auditors to accept approximate output matches.

By Naci Cankaya
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Not to Break, but to Attest: Adversarial Probes for Privacy-Preserving LLM Verification

The paper introduces a privacy‑preserving zk‑SNARK audit framework that uses adversarial‑style probes to detect logit drift between an approved large language model and a modified deployment. It offers three probe families—token‑based (black‑box), embedding‑based (gray‑box), and stress probes (partial white‑box)—allowing users to balance sensitivity, access, and cost. Experiments across LLM architectures and GPU platforms show token‑based probes achieve the highest mean sensitivity while remaining practical in a black‑box setting, with Groth16 proving times scaling modestly from 1.02 to 1.78 seconds and constant proof size.

By Cameron Wilding, Mina Shaker, Fatemeh Ganji
arXiv AI
Jun 6

Zero knowledge verification for frontier AI training is possible

arXiv:2606. 05433v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier AI governance frameworks increasingly use cumulative training compute as the primary criterion for designating high-impact models, but enforcement rests on self-reporting because no technical verification primitive for training exists.

By Pierre Peign\'e, Ky Nguyen, Paul Wang
arXiv AI
Jun 29

DataStates-LLM: Scalable Checkpointing for Transformer Models Using Composable State Providers

arXiv:2601. 16956v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid growth of Large Transformer-based models, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), now scaling to trillions of parameters, has necessitated training across thousands of GPUs using complex hybrid parallelism strategies (e.

By Avinash Maurya, M. Mustafa Rafique, Franck Cappello, Bogdan Nicolae
arXiv AI
6d ago

Cascading Gradient Inversion via LT-Code Inspired Peeling in Federated Learning

The paper introduces a new gradient inversion attack for federated learning that leverages concepts from erasure‑correcting codes to recover entire training batches and their labels from a single FedSGD round. Unlike previous analytic attacks, this method can exactly reconstruct batches of up to 128 samples on ImageNet and achieves over 90% recovery even when the attacker actively manipulates the model. The study demonstrates that federated learning’s privacy leakage is far greater than previously estimated.

By Saeed Shariati, Mohsen Alambardar Meybodi