arXiv AI By Pierre Peign\'e, Ky Nguyen, Paul Wang

Zero knowledge verification for frontier AI training is possible

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 05433v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier AI governance frameworks increasingly use cumulative training compute as the primary criterion for designating high-impact models, but enforcement rests on self-reporting because no technical verification primitive for training exists.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 16

OPEN-1B: A Fully Auditable Training Run

The paper introduces Open-1B, a language model trained under a new fully auditable regime that ensures every training operation is reproducible on heterogeneous commodity hardware with bitwise certainty. By enforcing a fixed order on sources of nondeterminism—GPU reductions, data batch ordering, and inter/intra-node communication—the authors enable auditors to replay and verify individual training steps on a single machine. The release includes the full pretraining dataset, all intermediate checkpoints, the training codebase, and an audit harness for step-by-step verification.

By John Donaghy, Brian Wilcox, O\u{g}uzhan Ersoy, Shikhar Rastogi, Adam St Arnaud, Alexey Titov, Jordan Greenberg, Ben Fielding, Harry Grieve
arXiv AI
Sep 11

Beyond Training: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Inference-Time AI Governance

The paper "Beyond Training: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Inference-Time AI Governance" presents a taxonomy of twenty inference‑time mechanisms for monitoring, verification, and enforcement, each evaluated on a four‑point readiness scale using evidence from four vendors. It applies this taxonomy to a two‑dimensional adversary model and maps the mechanisms to four governance scenarios, finding that most mechanisms are commercially available but only adequate against cooperative or low‑to‑medium‑capability users, not high‑capability state‑level deployers. The study also links inference‑stage controls to hardware‑stage mechanisms through a substitution principle and reports a second‑rater reliability of 0.74. whyItMatters":"The work identifies the current gaps and readiness of inference‑time governance tools, highlighting that existing mechanisms are insufficient against powerful adversaries and thus informing future regulatory and technical development."

By Samar Ansari
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Numbat: Building and Verifying a Self-Contained Machine-Learning Stack

The paper introduces Numbat, a self‑contained machine‑learning stack implemented entirely in Zig with no external runtime dependencies. It covers tensor computation, automatic differentiation, neural‑network modules, mixed precision, multi‑GPU training, data loading, and monitoring, and exposes a stable C ABI with over 1,400 entry points and bindings for six languages. The authors verify the stack against a reference implementation at multiple levels, uncovering ten silent recipe divergences, and demonstrate its practical capability by training a 25.9M‑parameter YOLOv8m detector on COCO 2017, achieving a competitive mAP score and matching single‑GPU performance.

By Thang Tran (CloudKites AI Lab, New South Wales, Australia), Lan Dang (Monash Business School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia)