arXiv Machine Learning By Dean P. Foster, Sergiu Hart

Proper Calibeating

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2605. 26703v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The classic concept of "calibrated forecasts" and its more recent refinement, "calibeating," are defined with respect to the standard quadratic scoring rule.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

A Ranking Approach for Measuring Calibration

The paper introduces rankECE, a new metric for assessing calibration error in predictive models. Unlike the widely used Expected Calibration Error (ECE), rankECE compares predictions with neighboring probability values, offering theoretical guarantees and empirical evidence that it better approximates ECE than traditional binned methods.

By Anirban Chatterjee, Rina Foygel Barber
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 24

Truthful Calibration Measures for Sequential Prediction

The paper investigates the feasibility of exact truthfulness in calibration measures for sequential binary prediction. It proves that exact truthfulness cannot coexist with completeness and soundness, even when outcomes are independent. The authors then provide two reductions that transform any base calibration measure into additively or multiplicatively approximately truthful ones, achieving a multiplicative truthfulness guarantee that improves upon previous results.

By Anagha Gokul, Jason Hartline, Lunjia Hu, Jonathan Ullman, Yifan Wu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Forecast Skill Is Not Decision Skill: Evidence from Weather-Dependent Decision Tasks

The paper argues that traditional weather forecast evaluations, which focus on statistical comparisons between forecasts and observations, do not adequately capture how forecasts influence real-world decisions. It introduces decision calibration, a framework that assesses probabilistic forecast performance from the decision-maker’s perspective. Using this framework, the authors compare a machine learning model to a classical numerical weather prediction model across various weather-dependent decision tasks, finding that forecast-level performance does not reliably predict decision-level outcomes and that model rankings can shift depending on the decision context.

By Kornelius Raeth, Nicole Ludwig