arXiv AI By Ruiqi Wang, Dezhong Zhao, Xuesu Xiao, Erdem Biyik, Byung-Cheol Min, Guohua Chen

PrefO2O: Zero-Shot Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning via Offline-to-Online Latent Preference Transfer

Read the original on arXiv AI →

PrefO2O introduces an offline-to-online latent preference transfer framework that enables zero‑shot preference‑based reinforcement learning on unseen tasks without human feedback. It learns a task‑invariant latent preference space from limited offline preference data, disentangling transferable preference structures from task‑specific variations. The method uses confidence‑weighted optimal transport to generate reliable pseudo‑preference supervision for online reward adaptation, achieving performance that matches or exceeds traditional PbRL methods trained with real human feedback across various robotic manipulation and locomotion benchmarks.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jul 1

Freeform Preference Learning for Robotic Manipulation

arXiv:2606. 32027v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reward design remains a central bottleneck for autonomous robot policy improvement, especially in long-horizon manipulation tasks where sparse success labels provide too little signal and binary preferences collapse many competing notions of quality into one ambiguous signal.

By Marcel Torne, Anubha Mahajan, Abhijnya Bhat, Chelsea Finn
arXiv AI
Oct 16

LIBERO-PeRM: Benchmarking Personalized Robotic Manipulation

LIBERO-PeRM is a benchmark for studying personalized robotic manipulation, focusing on how policies learn and follow user preferences in zero‑shot settings, from demonstrations, and across varying tasks and layouts. It introduces a taxonomy of language‑expressible preferences—motion, skill, and user‑profile choices—within the LIBERO simulation framework, generating 312 tasks with paired demonstrations and preference‑satisfaction metrics. Experiments reveal that current vision‑language‑action policies struggle with zero‑shot personalization, while supervised fine‑tuning improves learnability, yet challenges remain in generalization, decomposition, and conflict handling.

By Zhixu Li, Keqian Tang, Litian Gong, Jingyu Yao, Wenqian Zhang, Tianze Xu, Zehao Wang, Yuping Wang, Junge Zhang, Jiachen Li