POS-Signature Demonstration Retrieval for In-Context Dependency Parsing
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The paper evaluates two large language models, Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Claude Opus 5, on the bidirectional English Resource Grammar (ERG) tasks of generating English from Minimal Recursion Semantics (MRS) and parsing English into MRS. In generation, Opus achieves 76.3 BLEU—surpassing a 72k‑pair trained system and matching a million‑pair system—while Sonnet scores 65.7 BLEU, rising to 69.6 when selecting from ACE’s candidates. In parsing, both models lag behind ACE, attaining only 57.2 and 65.5 F₁ respectively, with exact‑match on about 1 % of sentences, highlighting that high generation scores do not guarantee accurate semantic parsing.
arXiv:2609.37883v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pre-trained language models (PLMs) with encoder-based architectures have shown impressive capabilities in zero-shot cross-lingual transfer for various...
arXiv:2607. 27421v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Intent classification is a core component of task-oriented dialogue systems, yet practitioners have limited systematic guidance for selecting deployable open-weight language models under compute, latency, and robustness constraints.
arXiv:2609.24650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Readability assessment is essential for tailoring texts to intended audiences across educational, healthcare, and information retrieval domains. Howeve...
The paper introduces TreeFuse, a training‑free framework that builds a semantic hierarchy from a full document and uses it to select and organize evidence for a query. By combining structural–semantic scoring with lexical attribution, TreeFuse retains supporting facts and relations while focusing the context on the question. Experiments on four large‑context models show a 1.72‑point improvement in QA‑F1 over full‑context prompting and a 58.55% reduction in answer‑context length.
FrameBench is a new benchmark that evaluates language models on their ability to distinguish semantic frames evoked by the same verb in different contexts, using multiple-choice questions grounded in FrameNet-style resources for English and Japanese. The dataset is generated and verified through a pipeline that incorporates native-speaker judgments, and the authors provide both the data and the code for construction and evaluation. Experiments show that small models struggle with this task, while several large models outperform human reference scores.