arXiv Machine Learning By Parishruthi Ganesh, Gerry Dozier, Cheryl Seals

Selecting Open-Weight Language Models for Zero-Shot Intent Classification: A Systematic Evaluation of 41 Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 27421v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Intent classification is a core component of task-oriented dialogue systems, yet practitioners have limited systematic guidance for selecting deployable open-weight language models under compute, latency, and robustness constraints.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 12

A Cost-Efficient Routing Pipeline for Multilingual Short-Text Classification Using Small Language Models

arXiv:2608. 10939v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual short-text classification supports operational systems such as content moderation, customer support routing, and intent recognition, yet aggregate evaluation often hides large differences between high-resource and low-resource languages.

By Wajdi Ben Saad, Safa Madiouni
arXiv AI
Aug 24

When Do LLMs Replace Fine-Tuned NLU? A Decision Framework for Intent Detection in Production Conversational Systems

The paper evaluates whether zero‑shot large language models (LLMs) can replace fine‑tuned natural language understanding (NLU) classifiers for intent detection in conversational systems. Experiments on ATIS and CLINC150 show that fine‑tuned RoBERTa outperforms Claude Haiku zero‑shot when ample in‑domain labels are available, but the LLM matches the supervised model on the broader 150‑intent CLINC150 schema. The authors identify three production‑relevant scenarios where LLMs excel—out‑of‑scope detection, robustness to ASR noise, and dynamic per‑deployment schemas—and present a decision framework to guide practitioners. whyItMatters:"The study provides concrete evidence and a practical framework for deciding when to deploy LLMs versus fine‑tuned models in real‑world conversational applications."

By Carson Rodrigues, Oysturn Vas
arXiv AI
Aug 25

Aslema at NADI 2026: Data Augmentation for Intent Recognition and Slot Filling

The paper introduces Aslema, a system for the NADI 2026 Shared Task 5, which includes intent recognition and slot filling. The authors evaluate four omni LLMs in zero‑shot and fine‑tuned settings, finding that fine‑tuning consistently outperforms zero‑shot inference. They further augment data by generating culturally grounded Tunisian Derja utterances with an LLM and synthetic speech via voice cloning, which improves performance; the final system based on Qwen3‑Omni‑30B achieves 86.8% intent accuracy and 34.7 WER on devtest, ranking 1st in slot filling and 4th in intent recognition on the official test set.

By Tajwaar Shafiq, Hunzalah Hassan Bhatti, Firoj Alam, Shammur Absar Chowdhury
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Aslema at NADI 2026: Augmentation through Fewshot for SLU

Aslema is a system developed for the NADI 2026 Shared Task 5, which involves intent recognition and slot filling. The team evaluated four omni LLMs in a zero‑shot setting and found that fine‑tuned models consistently outperform zero‑shot inference. They further improved performance by augmenting data with culturally grounded Tunisian Derja utterances generated by an LLM and synthetic speech produced via voice cloning, achieving top‑ranked results on the official test set.

By Tajwaar Shafiq, Hunzalah Hassan Bhatti, Shammur Absar Chowdhury, Firoj Alam
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

TalkFa: A Unified Benchmark for Farsi Dialogue Generation and Understanding

TalkFa introduces a unified benchmark for Farsi dialogue generation and understanding, comprising three datasets: WIKI‑FADIAL (4.2K Wikipedia‑grounded dialogues), DAILYDIALOG‑FA (6.6K dialogues with dialogue‑act and emotion annotations), and PLAYDIAL‑FA (2.1K theatrical dialogues with sentiment labels). All dialogues are curated through multi‑stage review by native speakers, ensuring high quality. Experiments show that LoRA fine‑tuning improves generation performance with less data, while specific models excel on classification tasks, and human evaluation confirms the benchmark’s reliability.

By Neda Jamshidi, Kamyar Zeinalipour, Fahimeh Akbari, Monica Bianchini, Marco Maggini, Marco Gori