Hugging Face Trending Papers

PlumeQuant: Uncertainty-aware consistency assessment of methane plume masks and emission-rate estimates

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Imaging spectrometers increasingly distribute source-resolved methane plume products in which the plume mask, integrated mass enhancement (IME), plume length, emission rate, and uncertainty are physically and algorithmically linked. Using 63 EMIT-derived Carbon Mapper plume records from 27 scenes, we show that these published scalar quantities do not uniquely constrain the plume boundary: substantially different yet plausible masks reproduce the same IME, plume length, and emission rate.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Global monitoring of methane point sources using deep learning on hyperspectral radiance measurements from EMIT

arXiv:2604. 10094v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Anthropogenic methane (CH4) point sources are critical drivers of near-term climate forcing, safety hazards, and system-inefficiencies.

By Vishal V. Batchu, Michelangelo Conserva, Alex Wilson, Anna M. Michalak, Varun Gulshan, Philip G. Brodrick, Andrew K. Thorpe, Christopher V. Arsdale
arXiv AI
Sep 7

Methane Detection On Board Satellites from Unorthorectified Imagery

The paper introduces UnorthoDOS, a dataset and machine‑learning approach that enables methane plume detection directly on unorthorectified hyperspectral satellite imagery. Using U‑Net models trained on this data, the authors achieve performance close to models trained on orthorectified images (IoU 16.91% vs. 18.47%) and far surpass the traditional matched‑filter baseline (IoU 4.76%). They also demonstrate that FP16 compression can reduce model size by half with negligible loss in output accuracy, making onboard deployment feasible.

By Luca Marini, Maggie Chen, Hala Lamdouar, Laura Mart\'inez-Ferrer, Dr C. P. Bridges, Giacomo Acciarini
arXiv AI
Jul 22

Now We Know? A Systematic Comparison of TerraMind and THOR

arXiv:2607. 18504v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmarks for Geospatial Foundation Models (GFMs) increasingly rank models by aggregate score, but such rankings obscure why models differ: how much of the gap is architecture, how much is decoder capacity, and how much is a use-case-specific artefact?

By Frederick Schindlegger, Kenzo Bounegta, Eva Gmelich Meijling, Johannes Jakubik, Arnt-B{\o}rre Salberg, Theodor Forgaard, Nicolas Longepe, Valerio Marsocci
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 29

Boundary condition fidelity for bottom-hole pressure and CO2 plume prediction in geological carbon storage

arXiv:2606. 27515v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate prediction of bottom-hole pressure (BHP) and CO2 plume migration is essential for safe geological carbon storage, yet practical simulations often rely on truncated domains where artificial boundaries distort pressure diffusion and CO2 saturation footprints.

By Romal Ramadhan, Seyyed A. Hosseini, Larry W. Lake