arXiv Machine Learning By Mykhailo Minin

Physics-Informed Method of Group Data Handling: Adaptive Construction of Functional Representations with an Application to the Navier-Stokes Equations

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces a Physics‑Informed Method of Group Data Handling (PI‑GMDH) that builds functional representations of coupled physical fields progressively during the solution process, rather than fixing the structure beforehand. Using tensor‑product Chebyshev functions, the method is applied to the incompressible Navier‑Stokes equations in a two‑dimensional time‑dependent Taylor‑Green benchmark, achieving extremely low validation and test losses with a modest number of active functions. Comparative experiments with degree‑by‑degree, all‑terms PI‑GMDH, and reference PINN/KAN configurations demonstrate that selective progressive construction can yield a favorable balance of accuracy, model size, and computational time for this controlled synthetic benchmark.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

Physics-Informed Neural Plasticity: PDE Solvers That Reshape Themselves

Physics-informed neural PDE solvers typically keep a fixed representation while adapting parameters, which limits performance on heterogeneous problems. The authors propose physics-informed neural plasticity, allowing the representation itself to reshape during training. Their ReCAP method dynamically redistributes capacity via local enrichment, residual-directed splitting, gate-based pruning, and function-aware merging, achieving the lowest relative $L^2$ error on five challenging 3D and 4D benchmarks and reducing error by 10.7%–27.5% compared to the best competing solvers.

By Chun-Wun Cheng, Bingcheng Hu, Angelica I. Aviles-Rivero
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 29

Mosaic: A Benchmark Suite for Differentiable Physics Solvers

arXiv:2606. 27895v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Differentiable partial differential equation (PDE) solvers underpin solver-in-the-loop ML training, gradient-based optimal control, and inverse problems, yet the practical cost of obtaining correct, usable gradients from a given solver on a given problem is largely undocumented.

By Andrin Rehmann, Heiko Zimmermann, Dion H\"afner