arXiv Machine Learning

Physics-Integrated Operator Learning via Gaussian Splatting Representations

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

On the training of physics-informed neural operators for solving parametric partial differential equations

arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.

By Nanxi Chen, Chuanjie Cui, Airong Chen, Sifan Wang, Rujin Ma
arXiv AI
Sep 30

Transolver-$\sigma$: Joint Spectral-Physical Subspace Modeling for Neural PDE Solving

Transolver‑σ is a neural PDE solver that jointly models spectral and physical subspaces to improve accuracy in both one‑step and autoregressive rollouts. The method uses adaptive physical-state interactions, Slice‑Residual Physics‑Attention, and an axis‑factorized Fourier operator to enable information exchange between representations. Across five standard PDE benchmarks, Transolver‑σ reduces benchmark‑averaged relative error by 33.4% compared to the strongest baseline and shows strong performance on coupled multiphysics systems and real‑world fluid and combustion data.

By Haonan Shangguan, Hang Zhou, Haixu Wu, Yuezhou Ma, Jianmin Wang, Mingsheng Long
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 4

On the training of physics-informed neural operators for solving parametric partial differential equations

Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data. By incorporating physical constraints into the training objective, PINOs combine the cross-instance generalization of neural operators with the data efficiency of physics-informed learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

Physics-Informed Neural Plasticity: PDE Solvers That Reshape Themselves

Physics-informed neural PDE solvers typically keep a fixed representation while adapting parameters, which limits performance on heterogeneous problems. The authors propose physics-informed neural plasticity, allowing the representation itself to reshape during training. Their ReCAP method dynamically redistributes capacity via local enrichment, residual-directed splitting, gate-based pruning, and function-aware merging, achieving the lowest relative $L^2$ error on five challenging 3D and 4D benchmarks and reducing error by 10.7%–27.5% compared to the best competing solvers.

By Chun-Wun Cheng, Bingcheng Hu, Angelica I. Aviles-Rivero