arXiv:2607. 28762v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This work embeds feature interaction modules derived from factorization machines (FMs) into physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and neural operator learning, to enhance model expressiveness for solution manifolds of parameterized partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Quan Gu, Hongxia Liu
arXiv:2602.08515v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: This work investigates shallow physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving forward and inverse problems governed by nonlinear partia...
By Muhammad Luthfi Shahab, Imam Mukhlash, Hadi Susanto
The paper introduces a linearized Physics-Informed Neural Network (lPINN), a reduced‑order neural basis approach for solving forward and inverse differential equations. In an offline phase, lPINN learns continuous, differentiable neural basis functions from numerical solutions, which are then frozen for new problem instances; the online solution is obtained by minimizing the governing‑equation residual with additional constraints. Experiments on advection‑diffusion, Burgers', and nonlinear pendulum equations show that lPINN achieves lower solution and parameter errors than vanilla PINNs while reducing online inference times by up to three orders of magnitude, and its continuous representation generalizes to finer meshes without retraining.
By Wenhao Chen, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
arXiv:2607. 06841v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion models offer a powerful framework for sampling from complex probability densities by learning to reverse a noising process.
By Robert Gruhlke, Julius Berner, David Sommer, Lorenz Richter
The paper introduces Neptune, a method that uses independent coordinate neural networks to infer parameter fields in multi-physics PDEs from sparse measurements. Neptune can accurately estimate parameters with nonlinear, spatiotemporal variations, outperforming existing techniques by reducing estimation errors by up to two orders of magnitude and improving dynamic response predictions by a factor of ten. It also demonstrates strong physical extrapolation, enabling reliable predictions beyond the training data.
By Xuyang Li, Mahdi Masmoudi, Rami Gharbi, Nizar Lajnef, Vishnu Naresh Boddeti
arXiv:2606. 19754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) play a central role in modeling complex physical, biological, and engineering systems.
By Zhiwen Yu, Derong Yang, Liujian Zhang, Kaixiang Yang, Peilin Zhan, Jianmin Lv, Jane You, C. L. Philip Chen
arXiv:2607. 12570v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multiscale problems are notoriously difficult to tackle using traditional numerical methods, as accurately resolving fine-scale features often requires prohibitively fine discretizations.
By Marc Haltmayer, Jaemin Seo, Yuseung Lee, Sungyeop Lee, Jaehoon Jeong, Jae Yong Lee
The paper introduces a method to amortize physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) across related partial differential equations (PDEs) by explicitly modeling equation relationships in an operator graph. Coefficient vectors encode numerical parameters, while the graph hypernetwork generates diagonal codes that initialize a meta‑trained factorized PINN for each target equation. Experiments on scalar convection‑diffusion‑reaction, two‑field Fisher‑KPP, and a capacitively coupled plasma model show that term‑based descriptors and graph conditioning improve solution accuracy compared to coefficient‑vector conditioning, especially for high‑reaction and coupled systems.
By Cheng Jing, Abhishek Verma, Kallol Bera, Yixuan He, Kookjin Lee
The paper introduces the Physics-Informed Stochastic Configuration Machine (PI‑SCM), a backpropagation‑free neural network designed for solving nonlinear differential equations. By analytically evaluating local Jacobians, PI‑SCM linearizes the physical loss, enabling optimal weight determination through generalized linear least squares and avoiding iterative nonlinear optimization. The authors present a progressive algorithmic suite—PI‑SC‑I, PI‑SC‑II, and PI‑SC‑III—prove their universal approximation properties, and show through experiments that PI‑SCM achieves high‑fidelity predictions and parameter identification while accelerating training by orders of magnitude compared to standard PINNs.
By Yuehao Song (School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, China), Zhong Chen (School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, China), Lihui Cen (School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, China), Liang Wu (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA), Kai Zhang (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, China)
arXiv:2601. 20361v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) solve time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) by learning a mesh-free, differentiable solution that can be evaluated anywhere in space and time.
By Chen-Yang Dai, Che-Chia Chang, Te-Sheng Lin, Ming-Chih Lai, Chieh-Hsin Lai
arXiv:2606. 11963v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators provide a powerful framework for learning solution mappings of partial differential equations directly in function space.
By Mostafa Bamdad, Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi, Timon Rabczuk
arXiv:2609.36615v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) solve partial differential equations (PDEs) by incorporating governing physical laws into the training loss....
By Xiaodong Feng, Ziyu Sun, Tao Tang, Xiaoliang Wan, Tao Zhou