arXiv Computation and Language By Kshitij Ambilduke, Caroline Brun, Thibaut Thonet, Vassilina Nikoulina, Marcely Zanon Boito

Personalization Without Stereotyping: Do Speech LLMs Know When to Turn a Deaf Ear?

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces BASIS-Bench, a benchmark that separates demographic robustness, stereotypical bias, and personalization in speech large language models (LLMs). It evaluates eight recent speech LLMs, finding that while many models detect demographic cues, they rarely use them for appropriate personalization, and explicit demographic labels can worsen stereotypical associations. The study underscores the necessity of training speech LLMs to discern when demographic information should influence responses.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

Different Demographic Cues Yield Inconsistent Conclusions About LLM Personalization and Bias

The paper examines how large language models (LLMs) respond to different demographic cues—such as names—when users seek advice, focusing on race and gender in a U.S. context. It finds that using different cues for the same group leads to only partially overlapping changes in model responses, producing inconsistent conclusions about personalization and unstable bias metrics. The authors argue that LLMs react to linguistic signals tied to cues rather than to stable demographic categories, and they call for evaluations that use multiple cues and consider underlying mechanisms.

By Manuel Tonneau, Neil K. R. Sehgal, Niyati Malhotra, Sharif Kazemi, Victor Orozco-Olvera, Ana Mar\'ia Mu\~noz Boudet, Lakshmi Subramanian, Samuel P. Fraiberger, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Valentin Hofmann
arXiv AI
Oct 12

DEAF: A Benchmark for Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness in Audio Language Models

DEAF (Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness) is a benchmark comprising over 2,700 conflict stimuli that test Audio Multimodal Large Language Models (Audio MLLMs) across three acoustic dimensions: emotional prosody, background sounds, and speaker identity. The benchmark uses a controlled multi-level evaluation framework that gradually increases textual influence, from semantic conflicts to misleading prompts, to separate content-driven bias from prompt-induced sycophancy. Diagnostic metrics are introduced to measure how much models rely on textual cues versus acoustic signals, and an evaluation of seven Audio MLLMs shows that while models respond to acoustic variations, their predictions are largely driven by textual inputs, highlighting a gap between benchmark performance and true acoustic understanding.

By Jiaqi Xiong, Yunjia Qi, Qi Cao, Yu Zheng, Yutong Zhang, Ziteng Wang, Ruofan Liao, Weisheng Xu, Sichen Liu