arXiv Machine Learning By Damy M. F. Ha, Thalea Schlender, Yvette M. van der Linden, Peter A. N. Bosman, Tanja Alderliesten

Parallel Adaptive Multi-Objective Evolutionary Learning of Discretized Bayesian Network Classifiers for Clinical Data

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2605. 29058v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Bayesian Networks (BNs) are of interest from an explainable AI viewpoint, offering transparent probabilistic models for decision support.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Interpretable and Calibrated Classification of Clinical Data Using Supervised Feature Binarization

The paper introduces a statistically grounded framework for interpretable, rule-based clinical classification using Bernoulli Naïve Bayes (BNB). It employs supervised chi‑square‑guided binarization to convert continuous medical variables into binary indicators, enabling BNB to handle continuous data while maintaining transparency. On three benchmark datasets—Pima Indians Diabetes, Wisconsin Breast Cancer, and Heart Failure Prediction—the method achieved AUCs of 0.800, 0.984, and 0.919, respectively, and demonstrated reliable probability calibration through cross‑validated analysis and post‑hoc beta calibration.

By Antony Garcia, Adrian Noriega, Gabrielle Britton, Xinming Huang
arXiv AI
Jun 8

REMEDI: A Benchmark for Retention and Unlearning Evaluation in Multi-label Clinical Disease Inference

arXiv:2606. 07141v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language models trained for clinical disease inference are trained on patient data, which may include sensitive and private information, and data owners may request the removal of their data from a trained model due to privacy or copyright concerns.

By Anurag Sharma, Sai Teja Chunchu, Prasenjit Mitra, Sandipan Sikdar, Koustav Rudra
arXiv AI
Sep 12

Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection

The paper introduces ACTMED, a diagnostic framework that combines Bayesian Experimental Design with large language models to emulate real‑world clinical reasoning. ACTMED actively selects the most informative test at each step, using LLMs to simulate patient states and update beliefs without needing task‑specific training data. The authors evaluate the system on real datasets, demonstrating improvements in diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and efficient resource use while keeping clinicians involved in the decision loop.

By Silas Ruhrberg Est\'evez, Nicol\'as Astorga, Mihaela van der Schaar