arXiv AI By Qiong Tang, Xiangkun Hu, Xiangyang Liu, Yiran Chen, Yunfan Shao

Output-Space Allocation Costs for Calibration-Guided LLM Compression: An Empirical Study

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 27785v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training-free compression methods for large language models (LLMs) often use calibration data to guide compression decisions.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 1

Learning Functional Subspaces for Neural Network Compression

arXiv:2609.40127v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern transformers pair impressive capabilities with substantial memory and compute demands. Low-rank weight factorization reduces both while keepin...

By Massimo Bini, Anders Christensen, Stephan Alaniz, Judah Goldfeder, Ole Winther, Yann LeCun, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Zeynep Akata
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

LILA: Calibration-Free Structured Pruning of Large Language Models via Latent Spectral Geometry

LILA (Latent-Informed Layer Analysis) introduces a calibration‑free method for structured pruning of large language models by scoring neuron importance using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov distance between singular value distributions of full and neuron‑ablated feed‑forward network weight matrices. The approach requires no training, calibration data, or auxiliary networks, and outperforms existing methods such as PruneNet and SliceGPT on LLaMA‑2‑7B and Phi‑2 at various sparsity levels. After a single epoch of LoRA fine‑tuning, LILA matches heavily calibrated baselines, and a Neural Tangent Kernel analysis provides theoretical support for its spectral importance criterion. Additionally, LILA can dynamically allocate sparsity budgets, achieving state‑of‑the‑art generative preservation and revealing architectural bottlenecks at higher compression.

By Sankar Behera, Dhruv Singh, Anshika Agnihotri, Raj Kumar Choudhary, Satyadev Ahlawat, Yamuna Prasad
arXiv AI
Jun 3

Calibration Data Trade-offs Across Capability Dimensions: Why Multi-Source Mixing Matters for High-Sparsity LLM Pruning

arXiv:2606. 03328v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Post-training pruning compresses large language models to high sparsity using a small unlabelled calibration set, and recent work has concluded that the choice of calibration source has only modest impact on averaged post-pruning accuracy.

By Hu Xu, Zhaolong Xing, Congcong Liu, Jiaxing Wang, Zhida Jiang, Junshi Huang, Zhen Chen, Jianfeng Xu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 14

Unifying Depth and Width Pruning for LLMs via Binary Knapsack Optimization

arXiv:2608. 12953v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Structured pruning is a promising approach for compressing large language models (LLMs), yet existing methods rely heavily on greedy heuristics that produce myopic decisions, and often fail to precisely meet target compression budgets.

By Palaash Goel, Ayan Sengupta, Akshay Nambi, Tanmoy Chakraborty