arXiv:2608. 10372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-hoc calibration aligns a classifier's predicted confidences with its empirical accuracy without retraining.
By Lening Zhao, Qipeng Zhan, Li Shen
arXiv:2604. 27742v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A fundamental dichotomy in the theory of classification sets smoothness against statistical efficiency: smooth surrogate losses such as the logistic loss enable fast $O(1/T)$ optimization but yield slow square-root $H$-consistency bounds, while piecewise-linear losses like the Hinge loss achieve optimal linear $H$-consistency rates but are non-differentiable.
By Mehryar Mohri, Yutao Zhong
arXiv:2312. 14889v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In this paper we revisit the classical method of partitioning classification and prove novel convergence rates under relaxed conditions, both for observable (non-privatised) and for privatised data.
By Bal\'azs Csan\'ad Cs\'aji, L\'aszl\'o Gy\"orfi, Ambrus Tam\'as, Harro Walk
arXiv:2410.18321v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Confidence calibration matters wherever a classifier's probabilities, not just its labels, are consumed downstream. We study Focal Calibration Loss...
By Wenhao Liang, Liangwei Zheng, Wei Zhang, Weitong Chen
arXiv:2603. 20967v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: One of the most common machine learning setups is logistic regression.
By Avrajit Ghosh, Bin Yu, Manfred Warmuth, Peter Bartlett
The paper introduces soft‑label‑based estimators for the Bayes‑optimal balanced error rate (BER) and area under the ROC curve (AUC), extending from a clean setting with known class priors to a realistic scenario with unknown priors and corrupted soft labels. It also adapts the FeeBee evaluation framework to assess these estimators without needing the true optimum, providing practical evaluation scores for any estimator of optimal BER or AUC. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets confirm the effectiveness of both the estimators and the evaluation method.
By Ryota Ushio, Takashi Ishida, Masashi Sugiyama