arXiv Machine Learning By Seongchan Park, Hyunho Jeon, Byungsoo Kang, Gaeun Kim, Minseob So, Seongyong Kim

On-Chain Behavioral Signatures for Classifying Centralized Exchange Addresses on Ethereum Using Proof-of-Reserves

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper presents a classification framework that uses Proof-of-Reserves disclosures to identify centralized exchange (CEX) addresses on Ethereum. It analyzes 3,033,857 addresses from 15 CEXs and five non-CEX categories, extracting 58 on-chain behavioral features and demonstrating that LightGBM outperforms logistic regression across various lookback windows. Key predictive signals include gas behavior, ERC‑20 token activity, and internal transactions, and the authors release a feature dataset for reproducible research.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 20

Catching the Rug: Early Prediction of Fraudulent Memecoins on Solana via Machine Learning

The paper presents a method for early detection of fraudulent memecoins (rug pulls) on the Solana blockchain, using a dataset of 6.4 million tokens collected over seven months. It shows that most rug pulls occur within an hour of launch and that classic machine learning models, especially Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), can reliably predict them using only the first five minutes of trading data. Cross‑platform data fusion between PumpFun and Raydium further improves detection by reducing domain shift.

arXiv AI
Oct 28

FIDES-Live: Evaluating Behavioral Concordance in Sequential Trading Agents

FIDES-Live extends the FIDES framework to audit sequential trading agents by separating decision validity, numerical commitment adherence, execution and ledger reconciliation, and receipt‑grounded reporting. In a retrospective audit of 7,299 cryptocurrency account‑rounds and a 310‑round equity pilot, decision validity reached 97.35% and structured reporting accuracy 90.81%, while commitment adherence overall was 94.36% but dropped to 62.63% for non‑empty order proposals. The study shows that all cash and position transitions reconcile with recorded fills, and highlights the need to report concordance, evidence coverage, activity, and financial outcomes separately.

By Arther Tian, Alex Ding, Simon Wu, Aaron Chan