arXiv:2608. 14054v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time series forecasting with pretrained foundation models has demonstrated strong zero-shot capabilities.
By Juan Pablo Villa Serna, Rohan Asthana, Vasileios Belagiannis
arXiv:2608. 06223v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While deep learning models, particularly transformer-based architectures, have shown impressive performance in time series forecasting, the application of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in this domain remains limited.
By Yixiong Xiao, Congxi Xiao, Jingbo Zhou
While deep learning models, particularly transformer-based architectures, have shown impressive performance in time series forecasting, the application of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in this domain remains limited. Since RAG has proven effective in enhancing the capabilities of large language models by incorporating relevant external information, retrieving similar time series sequences as references might also improve accuracy in time series forecasting tasks.
arXiv:2606. 04135v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time series forecasting relies on historical patterns, but real-world series often exhibit non-stationarity and regime shifts that challenge fully parametric forecasters.
By Shiqiao Zhou, Holger Sch\"oner, Zipeng Wu, Edouard Fouch\'e, IAG Wilson, Shuo Wang
The paper investigates which historical examples are most useful for time‑series forecasting by defining predictive relevance as the expected future utility conditioned on inference‑time information. It introduces a two‑stage approach: a normalized‑pattern retriever generates a coarse candidate set, and a lightweight MLP reranks these candidates using future‑supervised relevance while keeping inference strictly past‑only. Experiments on six benchmarks show that this reranker improves pattern retrieval and outperforms a matched‑protocol baseline, revealing that historical relevance is structured, domain‑dependent, and not governed by a single universal retrieval rule.
By Yong-Hoon Choi, Kwang-Hyun Park, Youngjin Cho
The paper argues that zero‑shot time‑series forecasting should be treated as an evidence‑access claim rather than merely a no‑parameter‑update condition. It introduces a source‑first taxonomy that distinguishes three evidence sources—frozen LLM prior reuse, parametric time‑series pretraining, and retrieval‑augmented external memory—from the architectures that implement them. The authors further outline four audit questions—task interface, forecast object and scoring, prediction‑time context, and resource budget—to make zero‑shot leaderboards transparent and comparable.
By Delun Kong, Wanyun Ling, Chenxi Liu, Ziyue Li