arXiv AI By Chaolang Li, Jingyu Li, Zhaocheng Du, Xuyang Xie, Gang Wang, Pengwen Dai

Natural Hard-Negative Mining from Positives for Instruction-Following Retrieval

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces Natural Hard-Negative Mining (NHNM) for instruction‑following information retrieval, a method that turns original positive passages into hard negatives under query‑compatible instructions. NHNM uses a pipeline of Candidate Cleaning, Reversal Construction, and Geometry Filtering to generate a compact, high‑contrast training set called NHNM‑MARCO with nearly 7,000 instances. Models fine‑tuned on NHNM‑MARCO, ranging from 568 M to 4 B parameters, achieve strong instruction‑following performance on InstructIR and FollowIR, matching or exceeding larger retrievers and demonstrating that the gains stem from natural hard‑negative supervision rather than model size or data volume.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

When Hard Negatives Hurt: Bridging the Generative-Discriminative Gap in Hard Negative Synthesis for Retrieval

arXiv:2606. 01304v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hard negative mining has become the dominant strategy for training retrievers, yet it faces intrinsic limitations: negatives are bounded by corpus availability, selected by retriever score rather than diagnostic value, and increasingly contaminated by false positives as the retriever improves.

By Zhicheng Zhang, Jiwei Tang, Kuicai Dong, Xiaopeng Li, Jieming Zhu, Jingyu Li, Qianhui Zhu, Fengyuan Lu, Wang Jiaheng, Gang Wang, Hai-Tao Zheng, Zhaocheng Du
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Task-Level Natural Language Priors as Learning Signals for Low-Resource LLM Training

Task-Level Natural Language Priors as Learning Signals for Low-Resource LLM Training proposes Prior-Guided Tuning (PGT), a training approach that treats natural-language priors as auxiliary learning signals rather than just input context. The method introduces Contrastive Prior Steering (CPS), which adds positive and negative prior-conditioned auxiliary losses while preserving the original supervised objective. Experiments on AmbiMath, Jigsaw, and MNLI/HANS demonstrate that CPS consistently outperforms plain and prompt fine-tuning, achieving high accuracy and significant gains with limited training data.

By Jian Gao, Xiao Zhang, Xun Zhu, Miao Li, Ji Wu
arXiv AI
Oct 16

What Tracks Hard-Negative Transfer? A Study of Lexical and Semantic Signals

The study investigates which properties of hard‑negative supervision predict dense‑retriever transfer before training. It compares lexical non‑coverage, frozen‑encoder similarity, hardness proxies, and their combinations across BM25, dense, LLM‑generated, and hybrid sources for MS MARCO training. The results show that mean lexical residuality, an IDF‑weighted measure of query‑token non‑coverage, consistently reproduces the aggregate transfer ordering, while semantic statistics alone or combined with lexical signals do not improve rank agreement.

By Aarush Sinha, Rahul Seetharaman, Aman Bansal