The paper introduces a deep positive‑unlabeled anomaly detection framework that combines positive‑unlabeled learning with deep models such as autoencoders and deep support vector data descriptions. It addresses the issue of contaminated unlabeled data by approximating anomaly scores for normal data using both unlabeled and labeled anomaly samples, allowing training without labeled normal data. The authors provide a theoretical generalization error bound and demonstrate improved detection performance over existing methods on several datasets.
By Hiroshi Takahashi, Tomoharu Iwata, Atsutoshi Kumagai, Yuuki Yamanaka
arXiv:2602. 03293v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Unsupervised anomaly detection stands as an important problem in machine learning.
By Pritam Kar, Rahul Bordoloi, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Saptarshi Bej
arXiv:2507. 15584v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite the continuous proposal of new anomaly detection algorithms and extensive benchmarking efforts, progress seems to stagnate, with only minor performance differences between established baselines and new algorithms.
By Philipp R\"ochner, Simon Kl\"uttermann, Kevin Kammler, Franz Rothlauf, Emmanuel M\"uller, Daniel Schl\"or
arXiv:2505. 03509v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Anomaly detection in large datasets is essential in astronomy and computer vision.
By Pablo G\'omez, Laslo E. Ruhberg, Maria Teresa Nardone, David O'Ryan
The paper introduces ISER, an isolation-based method for unsupervised tabular anomaly detection that uses hypersphere radii to encode local density and maintains linear time and constant space complexity. ISER builds ensemble representations where smaller radii indicate dense regions and larger radii indicate sparse regions, and it employs a similarity-based scoring method that compares these representations to a theoretical anomaly reference pattern. Experiments on 20 real-world datasets show that ISER outperforms 12 state‑of‑the‑art methods, including an enhanced Isolation Forest.
By Yang Cao, Sikun Yang, Hao Tian, Kai He, Lianyong Qi, Ming Liu, Yujiu Yang, Hong-Kun Zhang
arXiv:2605. 26068v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Weakly supervised anomaly detection (WSAD) has developed in three primary directions: incomplete, inexact, and inaccurate supervision.
By Xu Yao, Siyuan Zhou, Zhenbo Wu, Chaochuan Hou, Shuang Liang, Shiping Wang, Hailiang Huang, Songqiao Han, Minqi Jiang