arXiv:2609.36968v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Unsupervised tabular anomaly detection (TAD) aims to identify anomalous rows in tabular data using normal training samples. While conventional methods...
By Doyun Choi, Dooho Lee, Jaemin Yoo
arXiv:2608. 19463v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Anomaly detection in tabular data is challenging because abnormal samples often arise as violations of cross-feature dependencies rather than simple marginal deviations.
By Tu Anh Hoang Nguyen, Dang Nguyen, Thuc Duy Le, Trung Le, Sunil Gupta
arXiv:2605. 26068v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Weakly supervised anomaly detection (WSAD) has developed in three primary directions: incomplete, inexact, and inaccurate supervision.
By Xu Yao, Siyuan Zhou, Zhenbo Wu, Chaochuan Hou, Shuang Liang, Shiping Wang, Hailiang Huang, Songqiao Han, Minqi Jiang
The paper explores how prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) can be adapted for anomaly detection in tabular data. Using frozen TabPFN features, the authors show that scoring samples by nearest-neighbor distance in feature space yields strong results, and they identify optimal layers and extraction procedures. They further improve performance by fine‑tuning the model on a reference set, achieving higher AUROC on the ADBench benchmark with both a fine‑tuning‑free (ZEN) and a fine‑tuned (FOCUS) approach.
The paper introduces a deep positive‑unlabeled anomaly detection framework that combines positive‑unlabeled learning with deep models such as autoencoders and deep support vector data descriptions. It addresses the issue of contaminated unlabeled data by approximating anomaly scores for normal data using both unlabeled and labeled anomaly samples, allowing training without labeled normal data. The authors provide a theoretical generalization error bound and demonstrate improved detection performance over existing methods on several datasets.
By Hiroshi Takahashi, Tomoharu Iwata, Atsutoshi Kumagai, Yuuki Yamanaka
arXiv:2607. 18289v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continual anomaly detection (CAD) studies how models can adapt to evolving data distributions while retaining performance on previously observed regimes.
By Kamil Faber, Mateusz Smendowski, Roberto Corizzo
arXiv:2606. 11844v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual anomaly detection in tabular data is challenging and remains largely underexplored, particularly in settings with heterogeneous feature schemas, distribution shifts, and severe class imbalance.
By Dayananda Herurkar, Federico Raue, Joachim Folz, J\"orn Hees, Andreas Dengel
arXiv:2507. 15584v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite the continuous proposal of new anomaly detection algorithms and extensive benchmarking efforts, progress seems to stagnate, with only minor performance differences between established baselines and new algorithms.
By Philipp R\"ochner, Simon Kl\"uttermann, Kevin Kammler, Franz Rothlauf, Emmanuel M\"uller, Daniel Schl\"or
arXiv:2607. 23924v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision foundation models have enabled strong training-free anomaly detection (AD).
By Jyun-Ze Tang, Po-Han Huang, Ming-Ching Chang, Chih-Fan Hsu, Jeng-Lin Li
arXiv:2610.07016v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: In few-shot industrial anomaly detection, the few normal target images provide no direct defect supervision, making anomaly prompts difficult to lear...
By Mengyang Zhao, Teng Fu, Haiyang Yu, Ke Niu, Bin Li, Xiangyang Xue
arXiv:2606. 28970v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Unsupervised tabular anomaly detection requires methods that are accurate, robust across heterogeneous datasets, and computationally efficient.
By Quanling Zhao, Jiaying Yang, Ye Tian, Josh Victoria, Zhijun Wang, Pietro Mercati, Onat Gungor, Tajana Rosing
arXiv:2607. 20530v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Semi-supervised anomaly detection plays a key role in diverse fields such as process monitoring, healthcare, and finance.
By L\'ea Billet (LAAS, INSA Toulouse, ANITI), Louise Trav\'e-Massuy\`es (LAAS-DISCO, Comue de Toulouse, ANITI), Elodie Chanthery (LAAS), Alexandre Gaffet