arXiv Computation and Language
ModularRSI: Modular and Generalizable Recursive Harness Self-Improvement
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 2
ToolSelf: Unifying Task Execution and Self-Reconfiguration via Tool-Driven Emergent Adaptation
arXiv:2602. 07883v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM-powered agentic systems excel at complex long-horizon tasks, but remain constrained by static configurations fixed before execution.
arXiv AI
Sep 2
HarnessEvolve: Learning from Reference Trajectories for Reliable Agent Self-Evolution
HarnessEvolve is a self‑evolving framework that improves agent harnesses—prompts, skills, tools, and execution logic—by learning from reference trajectories. It separates execution, evaluation, optimization, and gating into independent modules, addressing credit assignment failure, shortcut learning, and catastrophic forgetting. The approach uses reference trajectories to extract error signals, applies quality and performance gates to candidate updates, and validates updates on held‑out data, consistently outperforming state‑of‑the‑art baselines across diverse benchmarks.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 10
Evo-Bench: Can Language Models Improve Agent Harness?
Large Language Models (LLMs) have driven rapid progress in autonomous agents, yet standard evaluations remain confined to static task solving. An emerging frontier is harness evolution---the agent's capacity to autonomously optimize its own operating harness.
arXiv Computation and Language
4d ago
EvoHarnessBench: Can Your Agents Keep Pace with an Evolving Harness?
arXiv:2609.04280v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern LLM-based agents operate through a harness of tools, reusable skills, and specialist agents that shapes what they observe and what the...
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 7
EVOHARNESSBENCH: Can Your Agents Keep Pace with an Evolving Harness?
EVOHARNESSBENCH is a new benchmark that tests how LLM-based agents handle changes in their tool, skill, and agent harnesses over time. It includes 17 deterministic harness streams with 802 tasks, 520 tools, 42 skills, and 62 agents, and evaluates agents in two settings: deployment evaluation and self‑evolving adaptation evaluation. The study finds that harness expansion can cause forgetting, adaptation gains are inconsistent, and preserving old competence does not always aid new capability adaptation, highlighting harness evolution as a distinct challenge for agent development.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
Evo-Harness: Context-to-Harness Skill Compilation for Self-Evolving Agents
arXiv:2608. 15071v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning from experience is critical for developing capable, self-improving large language model (LLM) agents.