arXiv:2609.14857v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent work extends recursive self-improvement (RSI) to agent harnesses for long-horizon coding and terminal tasks, enabling agents to improve executio...
By Siwei Wu, Jincheng Ren, Yizhi Li, Haau-Sing Li, Chengran Yang, Yuxuan Zhang, Weicheng Gu, Jian Yang, Riza Batista-Navarro, Chuanyi Zhang, Xianglong Liu, Ming Zhou, Bryan Dai, Chenghua Lin
The paper surveys AI agents that operate primarily through command-line terminals, defining them as systems whose main action loop involves executing terminal commands, receiving textual feedback, and interacting with a stateful environment. It introduces a seven‑dimensional terminal competence profile to link system architecture, learning, and evaluation, and highlights how behavior is jointly shaped by the model, interface, harness, runtime, and environment. The authors argue for explicit reporting of system and runtime conditions, supported by replayable traces and process‑level evidence, to better understand and benchmark terminal‑mediated agency.
By Yi Bin, Xiaoyang Yuan, Haoxi Zeng, Wencheng Ye, Wenqi Shao, Chen Qian, Wei Ye, Yujuan Ding, Zheng Wang, Pengpeng Zeng, Jingkuan Song, Heng Tao Shen
Harness-Bench is a diagnostic benchmark that evaluates how different harness configurations affect LLM agent performance in realistic workflows. It tests 106 sandboxed offline tasks across multiple model backends, recording artifacts, execution traces, and usage statistics to analyze completion, process quality, efficiency, and failure behavior. The study finds significant variation in outcomes across model-harness pairings, indicating that agent capability should be reported at the configuration level rather than solely by the base model.
By Yilun Yao, Xinyu Tan, Chao-Hsuan Liu, Yaoming Li, Zhengyang Wang, Zongwei Lv, Wenhan Yu, Zhewen Tan, Yuxuan Tian, Lin Sun, Xiangzheng Zhang, Guangxiang Zhao, Tong Yang
The paper introduces a framework for evaluating large‑language‑model agents by focusing on the interaction between the model and its execution harness. It defines five complementary metrics—Valid Completion Rate, Model‑Harness Fit, Cross‑Model Fit, Interaction Residuals, and Token Load—to assess how reliably agents finish tasks, how well harnesses support specific models, and the overall suitability across models. Using these metrics, the authors evaluate four general‑purpose harnesses and two native systems on six benchmarks, finding that harness rankings differ by model and task and that some harnesses consistently achieve high valid completion rates.
By Shao Zhang, Hangfan Zhang, Yuanyuan Shi, Hao Li, Min-Le Su, Kangcong Li, Jingping Wang, Chunjiang Mu, Chen Zhang, Yang Chen, Bo Zhang, Shuyue Hu
HarnessEvolve is a self‑evolving framework that improves agent harnesses—prompts, skills, tools, and execution logic—by learning from reference trajectories. It separates execution, evaluation, optimization, and gating into independent modules, addressing credit assignment failure, shortcut learning, and catastrophic forgetting. The approach uses reference trajectories to extract error signals, applies quality and performance gates to candidate updates, and validates updates on held‑out data, consistently outperforming state‑of‑the‑art baselines across diverse benchmarks.
By Wen Jiang, Mingmin Chu, Yimeng Tian, Qianxin Zhang, Haofei Yang, Rui Yang, Yang Liu, Tao Lv, Fangming Li
arXiv:2610.00948v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The executable harness surrounding a GUI model determines how observations are assembled, actions are executed, and verification, recovery, and termi...
By Geyi Yang, Zikun Qu, Xiang Li, Zhiyong Wang, Min Zhang, Shipei Zeng, Zhongxiang Dai