Metric Scale for Insta360 Structure-from-Motion from the Camera's Embedded IMU
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
arXiv:2610.35554v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Structure-from-motion (SfM) from the dual-fisheye video of a consumer 360-degree camera recovers geometry only up to a similarity transform; in the pip...
arXiv:2610.28571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: ScreenCalib enables light detection and ranging (LiDAR)--camera extrinsic calibration using an ordinary programmable display, providing known visual ma...
The paper tackles the problem of calibrating a stationary camera’s yaw, pitch, and roll using a drone’s GPS trajectory, which suffers from altitude bias, time offset, and discrete sampling. It formulates a parameter estimation problem that jointly estimates the GPS altitude bias, time offset, and camera orientation biases, and proposes a maximum likelihood estimator based on Iterated Least Squares to handle the asynchronous, discrete GPS data. Simulation results show the estimator achieves accuracy close to the Cramér–Rao Lower Bound, with a recommended drone trajectory yielding calibration errors within 14% of the measurement error standard deviation.
arXiv:2611.07463v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LiDAR-Inertial-Visual Odometry (LIVO) integrates complementary LiDAR, camera, and IMU measurements to achieve robust state estimation. However, most...
MuyBridge is an on-device system that estimates an athlete’s segmental center of mass (CoM) trajectory from a single phone camera video stream. It combines a compact 2D pose network with a distilled monocular depth network, fusing their outputs through anatomical and physical priors to produce metric CoM estimates without requiring 3D or task‑specific supervision. On the AthletePose3D dataset, MuyBridge achieves 33–41 mm vertical CoM error and 2.3–6.6 % absolute‑relative range error, delivering CoM estimates at 63 FPS on an iPhone 15 with asynchronous depth updates.
The paper investigates what information is captured by egocentric video embeddings from models such as VideoMAEv2, CLIP, DINOv2, and VC-1, finding that the leading principal components largely reflect where the head‑mounted camera is looking. It also explores how to combine these video embeddings with body‑worn inertial sensor data for human activity recognition, showing that propagating inertial predictions over a video‑based graph can significantly improve classification performance (macro‑F1 from 0.648 to 0.852). The study demonstrates that video and inertial modalities play distinct roles—video identifies similar clips within a set, while inertial data labels the activities—yet fusing them directly in a single classifier or adding inertial edges to the graph does not yield better results.