MemFuse introduces a multi‑source memory fusion system and a corresponding benchmark, MemFuseBench, designed to evaluate agents that must integrate fragmented observations from multiple applications, devices, users, and time points. The benchmark uses a Scene‑to‑Sensor pipeline to generate source‑tagged observations, evidence‑grounded questions, and adversarial distractors, enabling systematic assessment of temporal reasoning, cross‑source evidence fusion, and noise robustness. Experiments show that MemFuse outperforms other memory systems across all evaluated LLM settings, especially on questions requiring cross‑source evidence fusion.
MemoryLACE (MemLACE) is a lightweight memory framework that explicitly models the lifecycle of textual evidence—capturing sparse merge, supersession, and contradiction relations—while preserving atomic natural‑language memories and their provenance. Unlike traditional systems that retrieve memories independently, MemLACE reconstructs relation‑aware evidence units that expose current, historical, supporting, and conflicting evidence for downstream reasoning. In benchmark evaluations (BEAM and StructMemEval) using both open‑weight and proprietary LLM backbones, MemLACE achieves the highest overall performance among same‑backbone comparisons and reduces BEAM runtime by 66.6% compared to the strongest reflective‑memory baseline, Hindsight.
By Meriem Yacoubi, Pia Schmidt, Nenad Petrovic, Ahmed Frikha, Martin Kirchhoff, Alois Knoll
UTILMEM is a new diagnostic benchmark that tests how conversational agents use long‑term memory, focusing on reasoning over dense histories, spotting implicitly relevant memories, synthesizing distributed evidence, and resisting interference from similar distractors. It contains 1,717 instances across five domains and evaluates a range of retrieval‑based and memory‑augmented systems. The study shows that strong performance on traditional factual recall does not guarantee effective memory utilization, highlighting a gap between retrieving information and integrating it into coherent, task‑oriented outputs.
By Peijun Qing, Fobo Shi, Soroush Vosoughi
arXiv:2605. 28831v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Long-horizon memory question answering often requires sparse evidence from heterogeneous histories, including events, object states, visual observations, temporal relations, and causal steps.
By Encheng Su, Jianyu Wu, Jinouwen Zhang, Qiucheng Yu, Chen Tang, Pengze Li, Lintao Wang, Aoran Wang, Xinzhu Ma, Shixiang Tang, Yizhou Wang, Houqiang Li
arXiv:2606. 28349v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context reasoning requires models to access, retrieve, and integrate evidence scattered across documents, dialogues, and accumulated interaction histories.
By Zeju Li, Ziyang Zheng, Yizhou Zhou, Qiang Xu
arXiv:2608. 03463v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-term memory is essential for LLM-based agents to sustain interactions and reliably leverage distant history.
By Yuxin Liao, Le Wu, Min Hou, Hao Liu, Han Wu, Zishu Wang