arXiv AI By Yi Fei Cheng, Fan Yang, Iremsu Bas, Koichiro Niinuma, Narishige Abe, David Lindlbauer

Measuring the Behavioral Fidelity of Long-Horizon Human Activity Simulations

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

ZeroHAT: Behavior-Conditioned Zero-Shot Human Activity Trace Generation

ZeroHAT is a new framework for generating synthetic human activity traces (HATs) in a target region without any real data from that region. It transfers behavioral patterns learned from real HATs in source regions and adapts them using publicly available contextual information about the target region. The system includes a consistency-aware intent extractor, a cross-region behavioral cloning module, and a behavior-conditioned activity realization module, and it outperforms the strongest baseline by 4.5–6.4× in downstream utility and improves fidelity by 15.6–40.8% across ten cities.

By Rongchao Xu, Dahai Yu, Lin Jiang, Guang Wang
arXiv AI
1d ago

SIMLIFE: Pattern Understanding for Long-Horizon Human-Agent Partnership

SIMLIFE is a scalable platform that simulates long-term household life with rich visual observations, ground-truth action logs, and synthetic dialogues. It introduces the SimLife-BP benchmark, which tests long-context pattern understanding by requiring agents to infer latent behavioral rules from weeks or months of everyday observations across 106 episodes. The benchmark includes 1,439 question-answer pairs that probe direct, counterfactual, noisy, and inverse reasoning under varying rule hints.

By Run Peng, Zinnia Nie, Jing Ding, Yinpei Dai, Yichi Zhang, Zengqing Wu, Yao Fu, Ziqiao Ma, Jiayuan Mao, Joyce Chai
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

EgoArgus: Benchmarking VLMs as Situational Assistants for Modality-Grounded User Supports

EgoArgus is a new, human‑annotated dataset that tests visual‑language models (VLMs) as situational assistants in five everyday dialogue‑video scenarios. It evaluates how well VLMs understand and decide when to intervene, especially when visual and textual cues are helpful, irrelevant, or conflicting. The study finds that current VLMs still struggle to reliably act as egocentric assistants and that existing modality‑bias mitigation methods offer limited improvement.

By Yu-Chien Tang, Yu-Hsiang Liu, An-Zi Yen
arXiv AI
Aug 7

LUNAR: Benchmarking Personalized Large Language Models on UNiversal User BehAvioR Logs

arXiv:2608. 05246v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing personalized LLM benchmarks primarily rely on textual personas or isolated behavioral signals, providing limited evaluation of cross-domain behavioral personalization, where responses must be grounded in heterogeneous daily-life activities.

By Jiahao Zhang, Yongzhi Tong, Zelin Fu, Pengde Zhao, Yanmei Jiang, Jiang Feng, Min Yang