arXiv Machine Learning By Hyma Vallabhapurapu, Marco Candido, Krishna Choudhary, Paul Steinacker, Ensar Vahapoglu, Chris Escott, Wee Han Lim, Andre Saraiva, Nard Dumoulin Stuyck, MengKe Feng

Machine Learning for Charge State Characterization of Isolated Double Quantum Dots

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 20871v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scaling semiconductor quantum dot arrays toward fault-tolerant quantum computing requires efficient tuneup of spin qubits, a process that depends on the analysis of charge stability maps (CSMs) and remains largely manual.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Sep 7

A Unified Physics-Aware Quantum Machine Learning Framework across Power GaN HEMTs and Logic Nanowire FETs: Predicting Unseen Process Splits and Held-Out Geometry Combinations with Lower Error and Tighter Split-to-Split Variability

The paper introduces a reinforcement‑learning framework that automatically discovers compact parametrized quantum circuits for modeling power GaN HEMTs and logic nanowire FETs. Using a graph neural network policy trained with proximal policy optimization, the method optimizes circuit architectures based on leave‑one‑group‑out cross‑validation error, achieving the lowest mean absolute error across 11 targets compared to six classical baselines. The results show significant reductions in error and variability for key device metrics (Ioff, VTH, SS) on both HEMT and NWFET datasets, demonstrating the viability of RL‑selected quantum circuits as compact, physically consistent surrogates without explicit physical constraints.

By Rushat Rai, Yun-Yuan Wang, Autsada Kakaen, Pei-Jie Chang, Doan Viet Nguyen, Yuan-Chieh Chiu, Doldet Tantraviwat, Niall Tumilty, Simon See, Wen-Jay Lee, Tai-Yue Li, Nan-Yow Chen, Tian-Li Wu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Comparing Classical and Quantum Machine Learning for Regression in High Energy Physics Collision Data

The paper systematically compares four classical machine learning models—SVM, ANN, CNN, and LSTM—with their quantum equivalents—QSVM, QNN, QCNN, and QLSTM—on simulated proton‑proton collision data from CERN Open Data. Classical models, especially CNN and LSTM, slightly outperform the quantum models under current hardware and dataset constraints, but quantum models achieve comparable accuracy with far fewer trainable parameters; for example, the QCNN matches a deep classical CNN using only four qubits and a depth‑three circuit. The study also shows that the regression task is non‑trivial for shallow polynomial fits, underscoring the relevance of the architectural comparison. whyItMatters":"The work provides a realistic benchmark of classical versus quantum machine learning performance on high‑energy physics data, highlighting parameter‑efficiency advantages of quantum models for near‑term devices."

By Tariq Mahmood, Zain ul Abidin, Itzel Luviano Soto, Alfredo Raya
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 17

Real-Time Detection of Charge Jumps in Superconducting Qubits with a Convolutional Neural Network

arXiv:2607. 14293v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ionizing radiation from cosmic rays and gammas can induce discontinuous jumps in the environmental charge of superconducting qubits (charge jumps), causing correlated errors that challenge fault-tolerant quantum computing while simultaneously providing a detection signature for quantum sensing applications.

By Daniel Gaytan-Villarreal, Peter Meiring, Daniel Baxter, Daniel Bowring, Grace Bratrud, Matteo Cremonesi, Giuseppe Di Guglielmo, Grace Wagner, Bowen Xiao