arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

Improving Cross-Site Whole-Heart Segmentation

The paper presents a modality‑routed 3D cardiac segmentation pipeline that combines TotalSegmentator‑initialized nnU‑Netv2 models with site‑characterized, label‑preserving appearance augmentation. By analyzing measurable image properties across sites, the authors design a bias‑field plus Bezier augmentation strategy that smooths spatial intensity perturbations and remaps intensities nonlinearly, followed by class‑wise largest‑connected‑component cleanup. On held‑out validation splits, this approach raises CT mean Dice from 0.8350 to 0.9135 and MRI mean Dice from 0.7695 to 0.7830 while reducing HD95, demonstrating improved cross‑site robustness in limited‑data whole‑heart segmentation.

By Tanish Mudaliar, Justin Li, Daniel Lin, Julianna Vo, Kaitao Liao, Xin Wang, Shu Hu
arXiv AI
Jul 14

A Unified Framework for Comprehensive Cardiac CT Segmentation and Phenotyping: Human-in-the-Loop Data Annotation, Vision Foundation Model Development, Multicenter Evaluation and Clinical Validation

arXiv:2607. 11287v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Comprehensive quantification of cardiac structures from computed tomography (CT) remains limited not by data availability but by the scalability of measurements, which makes routine use impractical.

By Pooya Mohammadi Kazaj, Leo Fridolin Weber, Wen Xie, Seyed Amir Ahmad Safavi-Naini, Anselm Stark, Giovanni Baj, Ali Mokhtari, Toshiya Yoshida, Christoph Ryffel, Taishi Okuno, Yoshihiro Akashi, Ronny R. Buechel, Thomas Pilgrim, Waldo Valenzuela, George C. M. Siontis, Xiaowei Xu, Moritz Hundertmark, Stephan Windecker, Christoph Grani, Isaac Shiri
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Beyond In-Distribution Metrics: A Systematic Out-of-Distribution Evaluation of Congenital Heart Disease Segmentation

The paper presents the first systematic evaluation of out‑of‑distribution generalization for congenital heart disease (CHD) segmentation, using the ImageCHD cohort as a held‑out target. It compares several segmentation architectures under different training regimes, showing that in‑distribution performance is a poor predictor of cross‑cohort robustness: nnU‑Net drops from 0.77 to 0.51 Dice, while SwinUNETR maintains higher performance at 0.67 Dice. Limited target‑domain adaptation with only 11 labeled ImageCHD cases boosts all SwinUNETR variants above 0.76 Dice, highlighting the importance of explicit cross‑dataset testing.

By Aniketh Vijesh, Shrisharanyan Vasu, Abhijit Ramesh, Clare Pomeroy-Ward, Harikrishnan Anil Maya, Sarin Xavier, Mahesh Kappanayil, Gilad Gressel