arXiv Machine Learning
Learning Steerable Clarification Policies with Collaborative Self-play
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv AI
2d ago
Rational Clarification by Assistive Agents via Value-of-Information Reasoning
arXiv:2609.37588v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Users of language-based assistive agents often make ambiguous requests. In response, an assistant can either directly act on its interpretation of the...
Hugging Face Trending Papers
2d ago
Rational Clarification by Assistive Agents via Value-of-Information Reasoning
Users of language-based assistive agents often make ambiguous requests. In response, an assistant can either directly act on its interpretation of the request --- risking misalignment with the user --...
arXiv AI
Sep 18
UnifiedPlayers: Enhance Tool-Integrated Reasoning in Agentic Reinforcement Learning
UnifiedPlayers is a cooperative framework that jointly adapts planning, execution, and evaluation for tool-integrated reinforcement learning agents. It consists of a Planning Player that generates tasks, an Execution Player that creates multi-turn trajectories with Python tool calls, and an Evaluation Player that builds executable verifiers, all coordinated by role‑specific rewards under GRPO. The approach outperforms prior baselines on mathematical and general reasoning benchmarks and yields a verifier with high adversarial detection accuracy and more discriminative reward signals.
arXiv AI
Jul 24
One More Turn, Less Regret: A Regret-Based Multi-Turn Benchmark for LLMs' Clarification Policies
arXiv:2607. 21143v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ambiguous user requests make clarification a sequential decision problem for conversational LLM assistants: they must decide whether to ask, what to ask, when to stop, and when to answer.
arXiv AI
Jun 3
Uncertainty-Aware Clarification in LLM Agents with Information Gain
arXiv:2606. 03135v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents often operate under underspecified user instructions, where latent uncertainty over user intent leads to erroneous tool actions.
arXiv AI
Aug 11
Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests
arXiv:2511. 10453v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models often respond to ambiguous requests by implicitly committing to one interpretation, frustrating users and creating safety risks when that interpretation is wrong.