arXiv Computation and Language By Di Wu, Sergey Troshin, Christof Monz, Antske Fokkens, Vlad Niculae

Ladders in Chaos: When, How, (and Perhaps Why) Does Test-Time Scaling Improve LLM Machine Translation

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper examines two test‑time scaling methods for large language models in machine translation: sequential sampling, where later attempts build on earlier ones, and parallel sampling, such as independent i.i.d. sampling with reranking. Sequential sampling shows a higher performance ceiling, offering a more diverse and effective set of translations, especially with limited sampling budgets. Human analysis reveals that while sequential sampling improves fluency and naturalness, it can reduce accuracy when the inference budget is large, and the authors attribute this effect to the model’s access to a larger target‑side context.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 21

UvA-MT's Participation in the WMT26 General Translation Shared Task

The paper reports UvA-MT’s submission to the WMT 2026 General Machine Translation shared task, competing in the unconstrained track for all 23 translation directions. The approach leverages test‑time methods of Large Language Models, using sequential sampling with a refinement prompt to generate multiple translation candidates and then employing LLMs as pairwise judges in a round‑robin voting scheme to select the best candidate. Offline evaluation on the WMT25 benchmark shows a clear improvement over traditional point‑wise best‑of‑N selection.

By Di Wu, Sergey Troshin, Wafaa Mohammed, Seth Aycock, Evgeniia Tokarchuk, Vlad Niculae, Christof Monz
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

Dynamic Lagging using Stable-Prefix Training for Simultaneous Translation

The paper introduces a training strategy for cascaded simultaneous speech translation that allows the system to dynamically decide how much of the source prefix to translate. By fine‑tuning a large language model (Qwen3‑8B) on stable prefixes—pairs of source prefixes and the longest shared translation with the full sentence—the authors enable contextual read‑write decisions beyond fixed wait‑k or target‑suffix deletion. Experiments on English‑to‑German, Japanese, and Chinese demonstrate that stable prefixes improve the quality‑latency tradeoff across various test sets.

By Hieu Hoang, Amittai Axelrod, Matt Post
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

Copy First, Translate Later: Interpreting Translation Dynamics in Multilingual Pretraining

Large language models show strong cross‑lingual abilities, but previous studies have examined them only at isolated training points. This work pretrains a 1.7B multilingual model on nine languages, recording checkpoints at fine granularity to track translation development. Using word‑level translation and a new dataset, the authors find that early learning is dominated by token‑level copying and surface similarities, while later stages involve more general translation mechanisms and refined copying.

By Felicia K\"orner, Maria Matveev, Florian Eichin, Gitta Kutyniok, Barbara Plank, Michael A. Hedderich
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 2

Towards Better Exploration in Sequential Test-Time Scaling

The paper investigates test‑time scaling for language models, noting that sequential methods often stall due to entering attractors—sets of answers that block further exploration. Across 27 experiments, over half of sequential trajectories hit an attractor within four iterations. Introducing a simple model‑mixing intervention reduces attractor incidence by 21.2 percentage points, expands solution coverage beyond a compute‑matched parallel baseline, and boosts recursive self‑aggregation accuracy by at least 2.2 percentage points.

By Joseph Rance, Fabio Pizzati, Juil Sock, Woody Bayliss, Marc G\'orriz Blanch, Philip Torr, Adel Bibi
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

M-GATE: Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency Benchmark for Large Language Models

arXiv:2608. 03803v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual language models are deployed across a hundred or more languages, yet most benchmarks test whether a model can perform a task _in_ a language rather than whether it commands the language itself, conflating fluency with proficiency.

By Tom\'a\v{s} Burkert, Angelika Peljak-{\L}api\'nska, David Zelen\'y
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25

EnSiTa - A Trilingual Multi-Domain Parallel Dataset and Benchmark for Domain-Specific Machine Translation

EnSiTa is a trilingual multi‑domain parallel dataset and benchmark for English, Sinhala, and Tamil. It contains human post‑edited training data across seven domains and professionally translated test sets for those domains plus an additional one, all produced through a multi‑year, rigorously quality‑controlled process. The authors use EnSiTa to conduct a comprehensive study of domain‑specific machine translation across six language directions, comparing from‑scratch Transformers, pre‑trained models, and decoder‑only LLMs under various training‑data sizes, model scales, and domain settings.

By Surangika Ranathunga, Nisansa de Silva, Aloka Fernando, Kavindu Warnakulasuriya, Isuru Wijesiri, Menan Velayuthan, Charitha Rathnayaka, Thivaharan Varatharajan, Sajeevi Silva, Piumi Kandanaarachchi, Uthayasanker Thayasivam