arXiv:2606. 05194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed to make decisions that require trading off near-term gains against long-term consequences, yet little is known about how they internally represent or resolve these tradeoffs.
By Ian Rios-Sialer, Shantanu Darveshi, Shuai Jiang, Avigya Paudel, Anastasiia Pronina, Ipshita Bandyopadhyay, Justin Shenk
arXiv:2607. 18910v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sequential decision making in non-stationary and partially observable environments requires rapid adaptation to latent regime changes.
By Yuyang Shen, Shan Dai, Daimin Chen
arXiv:2606. 03965v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models improve final-answer accuracy through extended chain-of-thought reasoning, but often spend tokens inefficiently and offer little inference-time control.
By Yu Xia, Zhouhang Xie, Xin Xu, Byungkyu Kang, Prarit Lamba, Xiang Gao, Julian McAuley
arXiv:2608. 09217v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central post-training paradigm for eliciting reasoning capabilities in large language models, yet uniform task sampling allocates compute without regard to differences in how tasks respond to optimization.
By Ting Zhou, Zhenqing Ling, Daoyuan Chen, Qianli Shen, Yilun Huang, Ying Shen, Yaliang Li
arXiv:2607. 17973v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Latent world models have emerged as a powerful planning paradigm by learning action-conditioned predictive dynamics and using them as internal simulators to imagine and evaluate candidate action sequences.
By Letian Cheng, Qi Zhang, Yisen Wang
arXiv:2606. 03017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reward transfer in Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is unreliable when policies must generalize to unseen combinations of environment dynamics and task goals.
By Yikang Gui, Bikramjit Banerjee, Prashant Doshi