arXiv:2607. 27076v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continuous cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitoring remains challenging due to motion artifacts, physiological variability, and the limited robustness of conventional pulse transit time (PTT) models under dynamic conditions.
By Kindeep K. Dhatt, Tengyue Wu, Hanbang Hua, Yayun Du
The Cross-View Attention Fusion Network (CVAF‑Net) is a dual‑view deep learning model that estimates cardiac output from short photoplethysmography (PPG) segments by combining raw PPG signals with a structured prior‑guided feature sequence map through cross‑view attention. Evaluated on simulated, vasoconstriction, and real‑world activity datasets, CVAF‑Net achieved a mean absolute error of 0.19 L/min on simulated data and as low as 1.20 L/min in real settings, outperforming most benchmarks while reducing computational cost by twelvefold compared to a leading Transformer model. Plausibility checks confirmed physiologically consistent correlations with age, heart rate, and systemic vascular resistance.
By Yaowen Zhang, Bo Cui, Libera Fresiello, Peter H. Veltink, Dirk W. Donker, Ying Wang
Wrist-worn photoplethysmography (PPG) enables continuous monitoring of cardiopulmonary physiology, but reliable heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) estimation in free-living conditions remains challenging due to non-stationary motion artifacts that spectrally overlap with physiological dynamics. Existing signal-processing methods degrade under strong motion, while unconstrained deep learning approaches often lack physiological interpretability and identifiable structure.
arXiv:2607. 23406v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continuous cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitoring is essential for connected health systems and wearable devices, enabling early detection, longitudinal tracking, and personalized management of cardiovascular disease.
By Bo Wu, Haoling Wang, Zhuodiao Kuang, Kateryna Shapovalenko
PPG-Bench is an open‑source benchmark that evaluates five publicly available photoplethysmography (PPG) foundation models across nine datasets and 26 tasks, covering cardiovascular state estimation, activity, sleep, screening, and identification. The benchmark tests models under four downstream regimes—linear probing, random forests, frozen MLP probes, and end‑to‑end finetuning—while also comparing them to three controls: a random/constant baseline, a deterministic pulse‑rate‑variability feature set, and a generic time‑series foundation model (MOMENT). Results show that over a third of task‑regime combinations yield no advantage for any PPG foundation model over the baseline, and in most cases no PPG‑specific model outperforms the simple controls, indicating that current PPG foundation models lack generalised, transferable representations.
By Arvasu Kulkarni, Mahir Jain, Aditya Ray Mishra, Sandeep Singh, Siddharth Panwar
arXiv:2608. 12944v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electrocardiography (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG), and phonocardiography (PCG) provide complementary views of the same cardiac cycle, yet existing cardiac foundation models are trained for a single sensing modality, leaving the shared physiology across sensors unexploited.
By Hamza Shafiq, Hung Manh Pham, Bin Zhu, Pan Zhou, Jun Hu, Aaqib Saeed