arXiv Machine Learning By Bente Hinkenhuis, Seyed Sahand Mohammadi Ziabari, Ali Mohammed Mansoor Alsahag

Integrating Fairness and Explainability in a Multiple Instance Reinforcement Learning System

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper proposes a multi‑objective framework that integrates reinforcement learning‑based multiple instance learning (RL‑MIL), adversarial debiasing, and preference‑conditioned hypernetworks to predict student performance while addressing fairness concerns. Each student is represented as a bag of weakly labeled interactions, and an RL agent selects informative instances for classification. Although the baseline RL‑MIL achieves strong accuracy, the hypernetwork extensions fail to produce a smooth trade‑off between predictive performance and Equalized Odds due to mode collapse, objective dominance, and weak gradient propagation, indicating that additional mechanisms are needed for stable, fair RL‑MIL systems.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 25

Fairness-Aware Mixture-of-Experts via Subgroup Reweighting and Gate Regularization

The paper proposes a fairness-aware Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that tackles routing-induced bias by applying subgroup reweighting to correct data imbalance and gate entropy regularization to prevent the gating network from collapsing onto subgroup attributes. This end-to-end approach keeps expert utilization balanced and interpretable, offering a clear view of how subgroups are allocated across experts. Experiments show that the method improves fairness while maintaining competitive predictive performance.

By Sunhee Hwang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 20

To Go Far, Go Together: Diverse Preferences Induce a Curriculum for Reward Optimization

The paper introduces CurriPO, a tree‑structured curriculum that automatically adapts to diverse user reward models in AI alignment tasks. By exploiting the natural hierarchy between easy‑ and hard‑to‑optimize reward models, CurriPO covers a broad user population in a single traversal, reusing previously incorporated reward models. Experiments on personalized continuous control show that CurriPO improves population satisfaction by 1.2–2.1× over the strongest baseline while cutting training time and better serving users traditionally underserved by conventional optimization.

By Taehyung Kim, Jongeun Choi