arXiv AI By Maikel Leyva-Vazquez, Florentin Smarandache

Institutional Prestige as Geographic Bias in Large Language Models: Evidence from Three Factorial Experiments with Bootstrap Confidence Intervals

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The study examines whether large language models (LLMs) discriminate against candidates based on institutional prestige and geographic location. Three factorial experiments (4,320 API calls across four LLMs and five domains) reveal a significant institution‑tier gradient (+0.297 points on a 10‑point scale), a stronger prestige effect than country‑of‑origin effect, and a dominant journal prestige effect (Nature vs. a peripheral journal). The authors also identify a ‘rescue effect’ where publishing in Nature mitigates low institutional prestige, and quantify bias using the Neutrosophic Bias Index, highlighting evaluation inconsistency for low‑prestige profiles.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 7

Who Gets Access? Global Region and Academic Status Bias in AI-Generated Academic Gatekeeping Scenarios

arXiv:2608. 05178v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Equitable access to scientific knowledge often depends on informal gatekeeping decisions, particularly when resources such as paywalled articles, datasets, or professional materials such as curriculum vitae (CV) must be shared selectively.

By Nouar AlDahoul, Hezerul Abdul Karim, Myles Joshua Toledo Tan
arXiv AI
Sep 10

The Audit Decides the Verdict: Instrument Effects Rival Demographic Bias in LLM Decision Audits

The study examines how the design of audit questions influences perceived bias in large language models (LLMs). Using 40,726 requests across five models and three domains—hiring, lending, and medical triage—the authors find that demographic bias effects are not replicated when the audit is standardized. Instead, the audit’s construction, such as question phrasing and ordering, has a stronger impact on model responses than applicant demographics.

By Siddharth Vohra, Manikandan Ravikiran