arXiv:2609.22112v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to generate user-specific text with high stylistic fidelity. However, the personal data that...
By Muhammed Nazmul Arefin, Omar Jamal Hammad
arXiv:2608.22161v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Online users often release multiple texts under the same identity, giving attackers an author profile that can reveal more than any single text. Existi...
By Qian Ma, Anna Squicciarini, Sarah Rajtmajer
arXiv:2601. 04641v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The deployment of Machine-Generated Text (MGT) detection systems necessitates processing sensitive user data, creating a fundamental conflict between authorship verification and privacy preservation.
By Lionel Z. Wang, Yusheng Zhao, Jiabin Luo, Xinfeng Li, Lixu Wang, Yinan Peng, Haoyang Li, XiaoFeng Wang, Wei Dong
The paper "Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions" examines the difficulties of assessing text that is tailored to individual users’ styles. It critiques common metrics such as BLEU, embeddings, and LLM-as-judges, and introduces a style discrimination benchmark covering domain discrimination, authorship attribution, and LLM-generated personalized versus non-personalized discrimination across eight writing tasks. The study finds that ensembles of diverse evaluation metrics outperform single-evaluator approaches and offers guidance for reliable assessment of style-personalized generation.
By Anubhav Jangra, Bahareh Sarrafzadeh, Silviu Cucerzan, Adrian de Wynter, Sujay Kumar Jauhar
arXiv:2505. 14608v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite considerable progress in the development of machine-text detectors, the ease with which machine-text can be manipulated to evade detection has led to suggestions that the problem is inherently intractable.
By Rafael Rivera Soto, Barry Chen, Nicholas Andrews
The paper introduces a new authorship attribution model that represents each author with multiple consistent but distinct writing styles, rather than a single style profile. Experiments across four scenarios—audience size, temporal distance, preceding context, and genre norms—show that authors vary significantly in how idiolectic their writing is, and that certain settings yield text that is more informative about authorship. The authors demonstrate that modeling multiple styles per author leads to significant performance improvements over traditional single-style approaches.
By Omkar Yadav, Michael Jiang, Kenan Alkiek, Jian Zhu, David Jurgens