arXiv Machine Learning By Jasmeet Singh Bindra, Siddharth Panwar, Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury

How Much Capacity Does EEG Denoising Need? Ultra-Compact Networks reveal Benchmark Saturation and Metric-Utility Gap

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 08594v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep learning EEG denoising architectures have scaled from tens of thousands to tens of millions of parameters, yet no prior study has isolated model capacity as the experimental variable or tested whether reconstruction metrics predict downstream neural-signal utility.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jul 14

Learning Residual Kinematic Corrections for Continuous Neural Decoding via Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2607. 11530v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decoding continuous three-dimensional (3D) motor imagery (MI) using non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain--computer interfaces (BCIs) remains challenging due to signal variability and residual decoding errors.

By Jiamian Li, Niall McShane, Attila Korik, Naomi du Bois, Karl McCreadie, Leen Jabban, Benjamin Metcalfe, \"Ozg\"ur \c{S}im\c{s}ek, Damien Coyle
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

Learning Residual Kinematic Corrections for Continuous Neural Decoding via Reinforcement Learning

Decoding continuous three-dimensional (3D) motor imagery (MI) using non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain--computer interfaces (BCIs) remains challenging due to signal variability and residual decoding errors. Deep learning architectures such as convolutional neural network--long short-term memory (CNN--LSTM) models can capture spatial and temporal dynamics for continuous kinematic decoding; however, systematic residual errors persist in predicted trajectories.