arXiv AI By Maciej Markiewicz, Beata Bajcar, Wiktoria Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, Aleksander Szcz\k{e}sny, Tomasz Adamczyk, Grzegorz Chodak, Karolina Ostrowska, Aleksandra Sawczuk, Jolanta Babiak, Jagoda Szklarczyk, Przemys{\l}aw Kazienko

How Annotation Trains Annotators: Competence Development in Social Influence Recognition

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2604. 02951v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Human data annotation, especially when involving experts, is often treated as an objective reference.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 2

Who Annotates in NLP? A Large-scale Assessment of Human Annotation Reporting between 2018 and 2025

arXiv:2606. 02255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human annotation is the empirical foundation of much NLP research, from dataset construction to model evaluation, but papers often leave unclear who produced the annotations and how the annotation process was controlled.

By Maria Kunilovskaya, Gagan Bhatia, Lisa Sophie Albertelli, Yanran Chen, Christian Greisinger, Lotta Kiefer, Christoph Leiter, Subhadeep Roy, Tewodros Achamaleh, Muhammad Arslan Manzoor, Sebastian Pohl, Yufang Hou, Steffen Eger
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 17

Which Demographics do LLMs Default to During Annotation?

The paper investigates which demographic attributes large language models (LLMs) default to when annotating text without explicit demographic cues. By comparing non‑demographic, placebo‑conditioned, and demographic‑conditioned prompts on politeness and offensiveness tasks in the POPQUORN dataset, the authors find that LLMs exhibit notable gender, race, and age influences in their annotations. This contrasts with earlier studies that reported no such effects, highlighting the importance of considering demographic bias in LLM‑based annotation workflows.

By Johannes Sch\"afer, Aidan Combs, Christopher Bagdon, Jiahui Li, Nadine Probol, Lynn Greschner, Sean Papay, Yarik Menchaca Resendiz, Aswathy Velutharambath, Amelie W\"uhrl, Sabine Weber, Roman Klinger
arXiv Computation and Language
4d ago

Activating the Annotator: Operationalising Lived Experience in Data Annotation

The paper introduces AXLE, a pre‑annotation stage that uses a scenario vignette and guided conversation to generate a first‑person micro‑narrative for annotators. In a 2x2 study with 104 annotators on ambiguous hate‑speech items, AXLE increased identity resonance, sensitivity to harm, label entropy, and reduced inter‑annotator agreement, suggesting it surfaces plural perspectives rather than forcing consensus.

By Sheza Munir, Ramaravind Kommiya Mothilal, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed