arXiv AI By Chiara Bonfanti, Cataldo Basile

GROB: A Multi-Agent Architecture for Public-Trace Investigation of Candidate Agentic Activity

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces GROB, a multi‑agent system designed to investigate potential autonomous‑agent activity using only publicly available Internet traces when privileged telemetry is not accessible. GROB collects read‑only public traces and stores selected observations for future analysis. In a September 2026 dataset, some traces gained additional meaning as new public evidence appeared, notably Census‑labelled identifiers that were later linked to specific Census requests, while other traces showed weaker or uncertain connections to later evidence. The study concludes that sparse public traces can remain useful for later reconstruction, but they alone cannot establish organizational attribution, and the continuity of agent identity remains an open research question.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 18

TRACE: Accountable Agentic Retrieval for Source Discovery in Digital Archives

TRACE is a training‑free, agentic retrieval framework that enables accountable source discovery in historical archives, addressing challenges such as OCR degradation and genre heterogeneity. Developed for the DECIDON project on French Third Republic political discourse, it is deployed internally for 24 researchers across six institutions. On the HistoriQA‑ThirdRepublic benchmark, TRACE achieves R@10 of 0.856 and MRR of 0.653, outperforming sparse, dense, graph‑based, and other agentic RAG baselines, especially on multi‑hop and cross‑corpus questions, while costing only about $0.02 per question.

By Donghan Bian (ENC, LRE), Marie Puren (LRE, ENC), Florian Cafiero (LRE, ENC)
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Do Web Agents Investigate Before They Decide?

The paper introduces MIRAGE, a benchmark of 750 multi‑step decision tasks designed to test autonomous web agents’ investigative abilities across Wikipedia Forensics, Shopping Admin adjudication, and Reddit Moderation. Each task contains a misleading visible context and a hidden context that holds decisive evidence, allowing performance to be broken down into Investigation, Reasoning, and Decision Accuracy, with an added Investigative Hallucination Rate. Evaluation of eight LLM agents reveals three consistent patterns: agents often reach relevant pages but fail to extract decisive evidence, procedural hints improve investigation but not decision accuracy on Wikipedia tasks, and 12.6% of trajectories include fabricated facts.

By Syed Nazmus Sakib, Nafiul Haque, Tapodhir Karmakar Taton, Shahrear Bin Amin, Shifat E. Arman