arXiv AI By Shuang Wu

Gaussian Process Bandits for AI System Optimization with Selectively Verified Feedback

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper presents a framework for optimizing AI system configurations using Gaussian process bandits with selectively verified feedback. It introduces a fixed audit design that balances reliability coverage and reward separation, derives finite‑time regret bounds under a hard audit budget, and proposes a safe adaptive extension that mixes this design with Chernoff allocations. Experiments on synthetic data compare the certified designs to adaptive heuristics and standard GP controls, showing that safe adaptive allocation can reduce aggregate regret but may have loose finite‑budget error certificates.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 27

Safety by Design: Realized-Cost Constraints for Contextual Bandits with Continuous Actions

The paper introduces a new approach to safety in contextual bandits with continuous actions by enforcing high‑probability constraints on the realized cost rather than on its expectation. It proposes the High‑Probability Constrained UCB algorithm, which balances optimistic reward exploration with pessimistic safety estimation. The authors provide theoretical regret guarantees for linear models and extend the analysis to general function classes, demonstrating experimentally that realized‑cost constraints significantly reduce safety violations compared to expected‑cost baselines.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Safety by Design: Realized-Cost Constraints for Contextual Bandits with Continuous Actions

The paper introduces a new approach to safety in contextual bandits with continuous actions, focusing on high‑probability constraints on the realized cost rather than expected cost. It presents the High‑Probability Constrained UCB algorithm, which balances reward exploration with conservative safety estimation, and provides theoretical regret guarantees for linear models and extensions to general function classes. Experiments demonstrate that this realized‑cost safety framework significantly reduces safety violations compared to expected‑cost constrained methods.

By Spyros Dragazis, Aldo Pacchiano
arXiv AI
Jun 29

Uncertainty-Aware Reward Discounting for Mitigating Reward Hacking

arXiv:2604. 26360v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) systems face a compounding alignment challenge: not only are learned reward models uncertain about unseen state-action pairs, but the human preference annotations they are trained on are themselves inconsistent, context-dependent, and noisy.

By Disha Singha
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 11

Finite Constant Frontiers and Auditable Regret Certificates for Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2608. 07725v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Average-reward reinforcement-learning regret is known up to logarithmic factors, but the numerical content of published guarantees is difficult to compare because probability mode, structural parameter, logarithmic normalization, prior information, and planning assumptions differ.

By Ibne Farabi Shihab, Abu Sa-Adat Mohamed Moon-Im Al Ahsan, Md Najmus Swaqeeb