arXiv Computation and Language By Fiorenzo Parascandolo, Enver Sangineto, Xiaoyi Yu, Wenhui Tan, Jipei He, Ruihua Song, Rita Cucchiara

Frustratingly Easy Majority Voting Using Length Conditioning

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces Length‑Conditioned Majority Voting (LCMV), a test‑time training method that enhances the standard Majority Voting (MV) technique for Large Language Models (LLMs). LCMV incorporates an empirical bias that longer Chain‑of‑Thoughts (CoTs) are less likely to be correct by modeling a length‑conditioned prior with a logistic function. This prior is adapted on unlabeled test data without fine‑tuning the LLM, and the resulting weighted votes consistently outperform standard MV and other length‑ or confidence‑based aggregation strategies across multiple reasoning benchmarks.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Jun 3

Distribution-Calibrated Inference Time Compute for Thinking LLM-as-a-Judge

arXiv:2512. 03019v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Thinking Large Language Models (LLMs) used as judges for pairwise preferences remain noisy at the single-sample level, and common aggregation rules (majority vote, soft self-consistency, or instruction-based self-aggregation) are inconsistent when ties are allowed.

By Hamid Dadkhahi, Firas Trabelsi, Parker Riley, Juraj Juraska, Mehdi Mirzazadeh
arXiv AI
Sep 24

Count Evidence, Not Sentences: Tempered Evidence Fusion of LLM Judgments for Long-Text Value Measurement

arXiv:2609.27165v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to measure public value orientations from long social media posts, yet such posts often mix backgr...

By Yuhe Wu, Rui Qian, Guangyu Wang, Yuran Chen, Yuanchao Zhu, Junjie Yang, Zhengheng Li, Jiulin Cai, Tianyi Zhang, Zihan Dong, Jiaxin Liu, Yujie Chen, Guang Zhang