arXiv Machine Learning
From Uncertainty to Action: Learning to Steer LLM Agents
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1
Last Step Matters: Early Uncertainty Cannot Predict Failure in Long-Horizon Agents
arXiv:2608.29685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Early failure prediction is important for long-horizon agents, as it enables timely intervention and can reduce inference and tool-use costs. Uncertain...
arXiv AI
Jul 16
When Agents Disagree With Themselves: Behavioral Consistency as an Uncertainty Signal for LLM Agents
arXiv:2602. 11619v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Running the same LLM agent on identical inputs yields 2.
arXiv AI
Oct 16
LEASH: Uncertainty-Aware Weak-to-Strong Escalation and Oversight for Computer-Use Agents
LEASH is a training‑free framework that enables uncertainty‑aware escalation from a weak to a strong computer‑use agent. It uses latent uncertainty signals from the weak agent’s hidden states to decide when to hand off control, and a shadow observer to maintain oversight of the strong black‑box agent. Experiments on OSWorld show LEASH improves task success over standalone weak agents and outperforms random escalation, achieving comparable performance to Claude Opus 5 while cutting inference cost by 19.2%.
arXiv AI
Oct 15
Can an Agent Learn to Predict Its Own Failure? Outcome-Grounded Confidence Calibration in LLM Agents
arXiv:2610.18614v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Controlling an acting LLM agent means deciding, at each step of a long-horizon task, whether to trust its next action, abstain, or hand off to a human....
arXiv AI
Jun 2
FALAT: Tracing Failures in LLM Agent Trajectories via Dependency-Guided Search
arXiv:2606. 00765v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents increasingly solve complex tasks through long trajectories involving reasoning steps, tool calls, and inter-agent communication.
arXiv AI
Oct 16
AgentPerturb: Evaluating LLM Agent Robustness under Controlled Interaction Perturbations
AgentPerturb introduces a systematic framework to evaluate large language model agents under controlled interaction perturbations, addressing the lack of unified evaluation methods for noisy real‑world tasks. The study quantifies robustness across frontier models, identifies task‑specific vulnerabilities, and shows that agents often fail to detect altered inputs, propagating errors and incurring higher computational costs. The authors provide a benchmark‑construction pipeline and plan to release code and data to support future robustness‑oriented training.