arXiv AI By Qingni Wang, Changdae Oh, Yuzhe Yang, Sharon Li, Jiachen Yang, Ang Li, Xin Eric Wang

LEASH: Uncertainty-Aware Weak-to-Strong Escalation and Oversight for Computer-Use Agents

Read the original on arXiv AI →

LEASH is a training‑free framework that enables uncertainty‑aware escalation from a weak to a strong computer‑use agent. It uses latent uncertainty signals from the weak agent’s hidden states to decide when to hand off control, and a shadow observer to maintain oversight of the strong black‑box agent. Experiments on OSWorld show LEASH improves task success over standalone weak agents and outperforms random escalation, achieving comparable performance to Claude Opus 5 while cutting inference cost by 19.2%.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 16

AgentPerturb: Evaluating LLM Agent Robustness under Controlled Interaction Perturbations

AgentPerturb introduces a systematic framework to evaluate large language model agents under controlled interaction perturbations, addressing the lack of unified evaluation methods for noisy real‑world tasks. The study quantifies robustness across frontier models, identifies task‑specific vulnerabilities, and shows that agents often fail to detect altered inputs, propagating errors and incurring higher computational costs. The authors provide a benchmark‑construction pipeline and plan to release code and data to support future robustness‑oriented training.

By Yuanjian Xu, Jinyi Han, Jianing Hao, Yuxuan Sun, Fanyang Lu, Richeng Xuan, Guang Zhang, Zhichao Hu
arXiv AI
Oct 7

Do I Need the Cloud? Uncertainty-Aware Step-Level Handoff for Small Language Model Agents

The paper introduces STEPGATE, an uncertainty‑aware handoff framework that evaluates each step of a small language model (SLM) agent and selectively escalates difficult steps to a stronger model. On a 52‑task single‑step benchmark, the Qwen2.5‑1.5B/7B pair achieved 82.7% task success with only 30.8% escalation, outperforming local‑only and random escalation baselines. In multi‑turn tests, STEPGATE reached 69.0% trajectory success and 84.0% action success while using only 30.0% cloud actions, demonstrating that step‑level escalation can close much of the performance gap to a stronger backend with fewer remote tokens.

By Abolfazl Younesi