arXiv:2605.18971v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: What determines the quality of a tabular foundation model? Unlike language or vision, tabular foundation models acquire their inductive biase...
By Mohamed Bouadi, Nassim Bouarour, Varun Kulkarni, Shivam Dubey, Aditya Tanna, Vinay Kumar Sankarapu
arXiv:2605.09424v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Generative modelling is a demanding test of foundation models, because it requires robust, holistic representation learning for a given data modali...
By Xiangjian Jiang, Mingxuan Liu, Nikola Simidjievski, Tassilo Klein, Mateja Jamnik
arXiv:2610.16990v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Tabular data generation aims to synthesize realistic samples from limited observations while faithfully capturing the underlying data distribution. T...
By Yu-Sheng Li, Jun-Peng Jiang, Han-Jia Ye
arXiv:2606. 29241v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data-generating priors are a central component of tabular foundation models because they define the task distribution used during pretraining.
By Zeynep T\"urkmen, K\"ur\c{s}at Kaya, Alexander Pfefferle, Frank Hutter
The paper demonstrates that a tabular foundation model can achieve strong generalization using only a single real table for self‑supervised pre‑training, challenging the belief that large synthetic or real datasets are necessary. By systematically pre‑training and evaluating across diverse benchmarks, the authors show that the number and quality of tasks that can be derived from a dataset are critical for downstream performance. This finding suggests that carefully constructed task sets from limited data can enable effective transfer learning in tabular models.
By Junwei Ma, Nour Shaheen, Alex Labach, Amine Mhedhbi, Frank Hutter, Anthony L. Caterini, Valentin Thomas
TabMF is a framework that repurposes pretrained tabular foundation models (TFMs) as encoders for supervised datasets, adding a dataset-level readout and fine‑tuning via contrastive post‑training on synthetic views. The authors instantiate TabMF on TabICLv2 and TabPFN‑2.5 and evaluate the resulting representations on six tasks involving unseen real datasets. The approach achieves the best aggregate performance among both learned and classical dataset representations, excelling in dataset retrieval, compact benchmark construction, and distribution‑shift severity assessment.
By Rafiq Kamel, Nicolas Atienza, Aziz Fouch\'e, Nicola Cancedda, Josif Grabocka