arXiv:2605. 19662v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Tabular foundation models based on pretrained prior-data fitted networks~(PFNs) have shown strong generalization on diverse tabular tasks, but they are typically designed for \emph{non-strategic} settings where data distributions are independent of deployed classifiers.
By Xinpeng Lv, Yunxin Mao, Renzhe Xu, Chunyuan Zheng, Yikai Chen, Haoxuan Li, Jinxuan Yang, Kun Kuang, Yuanlong Chen, Mingyang Geng, Wanrong Huang, Shixuan Liu, Shaowu Yang, Wenjing Yang, Zhouchen Lin, Haotian Wang
arXiv:2608. 17957v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) increasingly rely on in-context learning, where a model receives labelled examples at inference time and predicts labels for new inputs without updating its weights.
By Nour Shaheen, Junwei Ma, Alex Labach, Frank Hutter, Valentin Thomas, Anthony L. Caterini
arXiv:2606. 18812v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models for language and vision are powered by internet-scale data, while structured domains (tabular prediction, time-series forecasting, graph learning, reinforcement learning) are not.
By Abdelrahman Zighem, Jill-J\^enn Vie
arXiv:2608. 01400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models, driven by in-context learning, have rapidly grown in quality and popularity.
By Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Alex Labach, Zexin Xue, Shuyi Han, Valentin Thomas, Anthony L. Caterini
arXiv:2606. 01427v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) have achieved substantial success in generalizing across tasks without problemspecific training or fine-tuning.
By Tyler R. Johnson, Kian Ben-Jacob, Nima Negarandeh, Oriol Vendrell-Gallart, Ramin Bostanabad
arXiv:2606. 18677v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular stream learning requires predictions on sequentially arriving examples under distribution shift.
By Jinmo Lee, Doyun Choi, Moongi Choi, Jaemin Yoo
Foundation models for language and vision are powered by internet-scale data, while structured domains (tabular prediction, time-series forecasting, graph learning, reinforcement learning) are not. The substitute is synthetic data, which shifts the burden from collection to prior design.
arXiv:2606. 30410v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models for predictive machine learning on tabular data have recently gained significant traction in academia and industry.
By Lennart Purucker, Andrej Tschalzev, Nick Erickson, Gioia Blayer, David Holzm\"uller, Alan Arazi, Alexander Pfefferle, Mustafa Tajjar, Ga\"el Varoquaux, Frank Hutter
arXiv:2608. 10837v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The strong performance of foundation models for tabular tasks comes at substantial inference costs.
By Mykhailo Koshil, Matthias Feurer, Katharina Eggensperger
arXiv:2606. 07345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models, exemplified by TabPFN, perform prediction via in-context learning, inferring test labels directly from labeled training examples.
By Si-Yang Liu, Han-Jia Ye
arXiv:2606. 02106v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a single classification pipeline that combines an Equiangular Tight Frame (ETF) preprocessing stage with a tabular foundation model for in-context inference, applied identically across modalities once data is mapped to fixed vector representations.
By Julien Lafrance
arXiv:2606. 30258v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular foundation models have advanced deep learning for tabular data by delivering strong default performance across many small and medium tasks.
By Boshko Koloski, Xiangjian Jiang, Senja Pollak, Bla\v{z} \v{S}krlj, Mateja Jamnik, Nikola Simidjievski