The paper reviews secondary studies and research agendas on generative AI (GenAI) in information systems, synthesizing evidence from 28 selected papers. It identifies GenAI’s transformative benefits—productivity, innovation, personalization, and democratized expertise—while highlighting challenges such as technical unreliability, ethical risks, and governance gaps. The authors propose a research agenda that shifts IS scholarship toward shaping the co‑evolution of AI capabilities with organizational routines, societal values, and regulatory institutions, emphasizing hybrid human‑AI ensembles, situated validation, design principles for probabilistic systems, and adaptive governance.
By Aleksander Jarz\k{e}bowicz, Adam Przyby{\l}ek, Jacinto Estima, Yen Ying Ng, Jakub Swacha, Beata Zielosko, Lech Madeyski, Noel Carroll, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Bartosz Marcinkowski, Alberto Rodrigues da Silva, Viktoria Stray, Netta Iivari, Anh Nguyen-Duc, Jorge Melegati, Boris Deliba\v{s}i\'c, Emilio Insfran
arXiv:2606. 01613v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper presents an agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for domain-specific technical reasoning support, instantiated over a curated corpus of approximately 2,100 academic papers in intelligent tires, vehicle dynamics, and vehicle control.
By Kanwar Bharat Singh
arXiv:2605.22878v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Artificial intelligence is rapidly entering the core workflows of scientific research. Yet reliable scientific reasoning requires access to accumul...
By Shuofei Qiao, Yunxiang Wei, Busheng Zhang, Mengru Wang, Jiazheng Fan, Huadong Jian, Bin Wu, Shumin Deng, Yida Xue, Zifan Cheng, Xiang Chen, Dan Zhang, Junfeng Fang, Ningyu Zhang, Keyan Ding, Qiang Zhang, Jeff Z. Pan, Emine Yilmaz, Huajun Chen
arXiv:2608. 07254v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The increasing specialization of scientific research challenges existing classification systems, which provide effective representations of broad disciplines and research topics but often fail to capture the fine-grained conceptual structure of contemporary science.
By Daniele Raimondi, Feichi Lu, Oliver Grun, Mariia Eremina, Andrea Perlato
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific research workflows, particularly for bibliographic discovery and literature synthesis, raises significant methodological, epistemic and regulatory challenges for the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), especially with regard to disciplinary diversity, multilingual access to sources and the evaluation of results. This paper presents an on-going use case developed within the European project LLMs4EU and the ALT-EDIC infrastructure, aimed at adapting foundation models to SSH research practices and supporting tasks such as question answering, comparative document analysis and literature review.
arXiv:2607. 05956v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific research workflows, particularly for bibliographic discovery and literature synthesis, raises significant methodological, epistemic and regulatory challenges for the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), especially with regard to disciplinary diversity, multilingual access to sources and the evaluation of results.
By Adam Faci, Alessio Miaschi, Anne Combe, Pascal Cuxac, Francesca Frontini, Nicolas Larrousse, St\'ephane Pouyllau