arXiv Computer Vision
From Few-Shot Segmentation to Clinician-in-the-Loop Medical Image Analysis
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 21
Retrieval-Augmented Interpretable Learning: Towards Task-Specific Zero-Shot Models in Healthcare
arXiv:2607. 17508v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce Retrieval-Augmented Interpretable Learning (RAIL), a probabilistic meta-learning framework for zero-shot generation of task-specific interpretable models that synthesizes coefficient-space structure from natural-language task descriptions and a memory of previously learned task-specific predictors.
arXiv AI
Jun 16
K-Prism: A Knowledge-Guided and Prompt Integrated Universal Medical Image Segmentation Model
arXiv:2509. 25594v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Medical image segmentation is fundamental to clinical decision-making, yet existing models remain fragmented.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4
MedSAM2-Anatomy: Training-Free Inference-Time Optimization for Musculoskeletal Segmentation
arXiv:2608. 00195v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-resolution 3D segmentation of hip and shoulder anatomy from CT and MRI is essential for surgical planning, yet frozen segmentation models often fail under domain shift.
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 7
MedHorizon: Towards Long-context Medical Video Understanding in the Wild
arXiv:2605.06537v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Medical multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced image understanding and short-video analysis, but real clinical review often require...
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 9
Learning to Adapt and Calibrate: Score Distribution Alignment for Few-Shot Uncertainty Prediction in Medical VLMs
Uncertainty estimation for medical vision--language models (VLMs) using conformal prediction has gained increasing attention due to its distribution-free coverage guarantees. However, standard conform...
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16
A Decision-Aware Evaluation Protocol for Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation
The paper introduces a decision‑aware evaluation protocol for medical image segmentation uncertainty that separates uncertainty estimation from deferral policy and assesses their joint performance under fixed review budgets. It reports metrics such as fixed‑budget error reduction, risk‑coverage behavior, region‑level review proxies, structural failure modes, and sensitivity to review assumptions. Experiments on retinal vessel, skin lesion, and polyp segmentation with various backbones and uncertainty estimators show that estimator rankings vary with review unit, uncertainty target, and cost model, and that boundary and thin‑structure failures are partly due to annotation ambiguity.