arXiv:2605. 28787v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In the era of autonomous agents, machine-actionable data is critical for data-driven workflows.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
EvoOntology introduces a self‑evolving ontology layer for data agents, encapsulating the ontology as an MCP server with schema, content, and tool layers. It enables agents to query and interact with the ontology at runtime, using a builder agent for autonomous construction and a self‑evolution loop that refines the ontology through attribution‑guided edits validated by backbone‑conditional evaluation. Experiments on three data‑agent benchmarks with four LLM backbones show that EvoOntology consistently outperforms strong baselines and existing semantic‑layer approaches, effectively bridging the agent‑data gap for heterogeneous data.
arXiv:2609.22486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external sources when answering questions that require proprietary information or up-to-date live w...
arXiv:2609.09410v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While autonomous agents have made significant strides in "deep research" by iteratively navigating the open web to synthesize information, real-world p...
arXiv:2607. 28229v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The web is increasingly accessed by AI agents rather than humans.
arXiv:2607. 18029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers need to answer ad-hoc questions about the contents of domain-specific archives but often lack the expertise to write structured queries on the metadata.
DI-Bench is a pipeline that automatically creates realistic data intelligence benchmarks for enterprise agents by linking data tables, dimensions, metrics, and documents into an artifact graph. It generates questions that combine structured data queries with knowledge retrieval, validates answers via query execution and LLM-generated questions, and has produced a 731-task benchmark covering knowledge retrieval, analytical computation, and rule‑grounded reasoning. Evaluation of four models on this benchmark shows that only 32% accuracy is achieved on computational tasks that involve business rules modifying the computation.